“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

CYMBIOTIKA Liposomal Glutathione Supplement – PQQ
Checked against public sources between July 21 and July 24, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Reviews rose from 0 to 64 between November 25, 2025 and August 23, 2026 — no sudden jump. A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Calories | 25 |
|---|---|
| Total Carbohydrate | 5 g |
| Total Sugars | <1 g |
| Includes Added Sugars | <1 g |
| Ribiflavin | 1 mg |
| Glutathione | 150 mg |
| Phosphatidylcholine (from Sunflower Lecithin) | 20 mg |
| CoQ10 (Ubiquinol) | 20 mg |
| PQQ (Pyrroloquinoline Quinone) | 20 mg |
Printed on the package: PLANT-BASED · GLUTEN FREE · MADE IN USA · SOY FREE · NO ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS · KETO FRIENDLY · NO GMOS · NO PRESERVATIVES
We read 9 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed1
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
?Couldn’t verify independently2
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Reviews rose from 0 to 64 between November 25, 2025 and August 23, 2026 — no sudden jump.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews rose from 0 to 64 between November 25, 2025 and August 23, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 19, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$2.88 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.