Checked against public sources on July 25, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Registered owner records: Elysium Health LLC · Elysium Health Strategies, LLC. The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| NR-E (Patent-Pending Crystalline Nicotinamide Riboside) | 250 mg |
|---|---|
| PT (Pterostilbene) | 50 mg |
Printed on the package: NSF TM CERTIFIED SPORT · NSF CERTIFIED SPORT
We read 2 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
1 promise needs a closer look.
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Elysium Health LLC, Elysium Health Strategies, LLC. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
UPCitemdb resolves 850027537030 to "ELYSIUM Basis: NAD+ Supplement for Healthy Aging & Cellular Energy with 250mg 6" (Elysium) — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
FLORIDA, USA; DELAWARE, USA · Registration 4783210
594 Broadway, Suite 707, New York, NEW YORK 10012, UNITED STATES
IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements.; IC 035: Online retail store services featuring dietary and nutritional supplements.
UTAH, USA; WASHINGTON, USA · Registration 4956783
7500 212th St. SW, Suite 104, Edmonds, WASHINGTON 98026, UNITED STATES
IC 044: Medical services, excluding the prescribing or recommending of dietary and nutritional supplements or vitamins.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
$1.70 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 29, 2026
View on Amazon ↗$2.00 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 25, 2026
View on iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 2 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $51.00; iHerb was highest at $60.00 — a $9.00 range at check time.
No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.