Checked against public sources between July 21 and September 1, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
The listing says 1,300 mg of ashwagandha; the panel says 1,950 mg. We could not find an explanation for the difference — no blend, extract ratio, compound form or multi-capsule serving accounts for it. You are getting 1,950 mg of ashwagandha per serving. …
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Organic Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera)(Root)* | 1950 mg |
|---|---|
| Organic Black Pepper (Piper nigrum)(Fruit)* | 15 mg |
Printed on the package: VEGAN · ORGANIC INGREDIENTS · GLUTEN FREE · 3RD PARTY LAB VERIFIED · Certified Organic Ingredients · Ayurveda Grade Standards · Manufactured in USA · American-Owned Company
We read 2 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: NUTRIRISE USA INC., 8063451 CANADA INC., FioreWave S.A. (sociedad anonima (sa); URUGUAY), NUTRIRISE INC.. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Ashwagandha Root: 1950 MG | 180 Capsules” (variant: Default Title) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
WYOMING, USA · Registration 6819311
165 PONCE DE LEON AVE, SUITE 201, SAN JUAN, PR, PUERTO RICO 00917-123, UNITED STATES
IC 005: Vitamins; Dietary supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Nutritional supplements.
CANADA · Registration 6117297
78 Blue Whale Blvd, Brampton, Ontario, L6R2R4, CANADA
IC 005: Vitamins; Dietary supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Nutritional supplements.
URUGUAY; CANADA · Registration 5147968
URUGUAY); 25 de Mayo 444 Esc. 201, Montevideo, 11000, URUGUAY
IC 005: Dietary supplements.
CANADA · Registration 7205584
807 Av. Juan Ponce de León, SAN JUAN, PR, Puerto Rico 00907, UNITED STATES
IC 005: Vitamins; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Vitamin supplements; Dietary supplements; Multi-vitamin preparations; Nutritional supplements.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
The label amount is shown beside the range used in the linked ingredient studies.
1950 mg per serving — above the 250–600 mg/day used in the linked studies.
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 1.95 g of ashwagandha per serving. Studies we found used 250 mg–600 mg a day, so this sits above that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
$0.42 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 21, 2026
View on Brand website ↗$0.42 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026
View on Amazon ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 2 sellers at the same price at check time.
The observed listing and exact brand page repeat 1950 mg. That confirms cross-page consistency of the published claim, not the product contents.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The exact brand page is higher by 0.50 points. The brand page publishes 849; the retailer surface shows 56,682. Different systems can collect different review pools, so this is a signal to inspect, not proof that reviews were manipulated.
The brand page did not expose a complete star-by-star breakdown in the captured structured data, so LookCloser cannot test whether lower-star reviews were omitted. Source: exact barcode-bound brand product page · retailer surface · counts do not prove authenticity.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.