Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 850030106674 · back to the summary
Primal Harvest Hair Growth Complex - Daily Supplement
Exact product checkedGTIN 00850030106674 · checked 2026-08-31
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The 5 mg biotin (as biotin & rgen-bio™) claim matches the panel
MARKETING5 mg — listing title
PANELBiotin (as Biotin & RGen-Bio™) 5 mg — same amountHydrolyzed Chicken Collagen (Type II) 150 mg
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 5 mg of biotin (as biotin & rgen-bio™), and the listing-image panel shows 5 mg biotin (as biotin & rgen-bio™) serving size: 2 capsules. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C (as Calcium Ascorbate & Ascorbyl Palmitate) | 200 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B3 (as Niacinamide) | 30 mg NE | — | |
| Vitamin B6 (from Pyridoxine HCL) | 2 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B12 (as Methylcobalamin) | 5 mcg | — | |
| Biotin (as Biotin & RGen-Bio™) | 5000 mcg | — | |
| Pantothenic Acid (as D-Calcium Pantothenate) | 15 mg | — | |
| Zinc (as Zinc Bisglycinate Chelate) | 20 mg | — | |
| Copper (as Copper Bisglycinate Chelate) | 1.6 mg | — | |
| Hydrolyzed Chicken Collagen (Type II) | 150 mg | — | |
| Hyaluronic Acid | 15 mg | — | |
| Horsetail (Equisetum arvense) Aerial Extract 7% Silica | 42 mg | — | |
| Hydrolyzed Keratin (from Tibetan Wool) | 20 mg | — | |
| Calcium Bisglycinate Chelate | 57 mg | — | |
| RGen-Bio (Sesbania Grandiflora) Leaf Extract | 6 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out2
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Primal Harvest LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in NEW YORK, USA; DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Documented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing8
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how collagen peptides, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 239 on 2025-08-01 to 483 on 2026-08-28 (net +244). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
3
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850030106674.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…Made in a GMP-certified facility and third-party tested, with formulas designed to help us live well, together…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…Made in a GMP-certified facility and third-party tested, with formulas designed to help us live well, together…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…MADE IN THE USA WITH GLOBALLY SOURCED INGREDIENTS…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
| Benefit claim “…SUPPORTS HAIR HEALTH, STRENGTH AND FULLNESS*…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrolyzed Chicken Collagen (Type II) | shaded = doses used in studies (2.5 g–15 g) · bar = this label | 150 mg — below the studied range |
| Zinc (as Zinc Bisglycinate Chelate) | shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label | 20 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
- zinc — daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 850030106674 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Primal Harvest |
| Source listing identifier | B0CF61CYMG |
| Retailer listing title | Primal Harvest Hair Growth Complex - Daily Supplement, Gluten & Dairy … show full titlePrimal Harvest Hair Growth Complex - Daily Supplement, Gluten & Dairy Free |
| USPTO brand owner | Primal Harvest LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · NEW YORK, USA; DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | 814 FULTON STREET STE C, FARMINGDALE, NEW YORK 11735, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size: 2 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 60 Capsules | 30 Servings | Dietary Supplement |
| Badges printed on pack | GMP, MADE IN THE USA, GLOBALLY SOURCED INGREDIENTS |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C (as Calcium Ascorbate & Ascorbyl Palmitate) | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B3 (as Niacinamide) | 30 mg NE | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B6 (from Pyridoxine HCL) | 2 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B12 (as Methylcobalamin) | 5 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Biotin (as Biotin & RGen-Bio™) | 5000 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Pantothenic Acid (as D-Calcium Pantothenate) | 15 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Zinc (as Zinc Bisglycinate Chelate) | 20 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Copper (as Copper Bisglycinate Chelate) | 1.6 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Hydrolyzed Chicken Collagen (Type II) | 150 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Hyaluronic Acid | 15 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Horsetail (Equisetum arvense) Aerial Extract 7% Silica | 42 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Hydrolyzed Keratin (from Tibetan Wool) | 20 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Calcium Bisglycinate Chelate | 57 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| RGen-Bio (Sesbania Grandiflora) Leaf Extract | 6 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“KERATIN, HYALURONIC ACID + 5000 MCG BIOTIN” · “SUPPORTS HAIR HEALTH, STRENGTH AND FULLNESS*” · “Take a look inside Hair Growth Complex” · “How to use” · “Consume two capsules daily with a large glass of water, preferably with a morning or afternoon meal. Combine with regula” · “MADE IN THE USA WITH GLOBALLY SOURCED INGREDIENTS” · “Contains plant-based biotin to nourish hair follicles*” · “Featuring Hyaluronic Acid to support the skin barrier*”
Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $34.95 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store primalharvest.com: 55 supplement products (+2 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Niacin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)
Vitamin B6 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Biotin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,606) · no UL; high doses interfere with lab tests
Pantothenic Acid — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (601) · no UL established
Zinc — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)
Copper — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (9,405) · UL 10 mg (adults)
Calcium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
collagen peptides — PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.
zinc — NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 850030106674 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai