lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 850033272826 · back to the summary

Double Wood Supplements NAD+ Anti Aging & Cell Regeneration | 500mg of 95% Pure NAD Plus…

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built July 25, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00850033272826 · checked 2026-07-25

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

1listed rows
1separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 1 listed row. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide500 mg per serving

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Double Wood LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in PENNSYLVANIA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Reviews accumulated gradually

Written reviews grew from 347 to 350 across 2026-02-23 – 2026-03-09 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~3).

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing6

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

Panel amounts are awaiting a clearer image read

The current image extraction saved 1 ingredient name(s) but no usable amounts. This is a LookCloser processing gap, not evidence that the brand withheld the numbers; dose arithmetic is withheld until the panel is re-read.

No data

Public label filing not saved

This record does not currently hold an matched to this exact product public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 165 on 2026-02-09 to 350 on 2026-03-09 (net +185). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie

The package says manufactured by: Double Wood L. USPTO names Double Wood LLC as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850033272826.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…Supply | Similar to Nicotinamide Riboside | Third Party Tested, Vegan Safe, Non-GMO SUPPORTS NAD LEVELS: Su…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Benefit claim
“…de | Third Party Tested, Vegan Safe, Non-GMO SUPPORTS NAD LEVELS: Supplementing with 95% pure NAD…”
Not checked yet
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID850033272826 — via source listing UPC
BrandDouble Wood Supplements
Source listing identifierB0C3MWF7F1
Retailer listing titleDouble Wood Supplements NAD+ Anti Aging & Cell Regeneration | 500mg of…
show full title Double Wood Supplements NAD+ Anti Aging & Cell Regeneration | 500mg of 95% Pure NAD Plus Per Serving, 30 Day Supply | Similar to Nicotinamide Riboside | Third Party Tested, Vegan Safe, Non-GMO
USPTO brand ownerDouble Wood LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · PENNSYLVANIA, USA
Owner filed address22 Lindsey Ave, Danville, PENNSYLVANIA 17821, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving sizeServing Size
Pack statement60 Capsules

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide500 mg per servingHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“500 mg per serving” · “Dietary Supplement” · “NAD BOOSTER” · “Supplementing with 95% pure NAD may help boost NAD levels as we age, making it an ideal longevity supplement.” · “This vital coenzyme is involved in mitochondrial activity and supports cellular energy production, cognitive function, a” · “BETTER TOGETHER” · “*Age gracefully with Resveratrol and NAD+.” · “Resveratrol activates sirtuins, proteins that work”

Read by a vision model from 4 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$29.95 checked Jul 25, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Brand store doublewoodsupplements.com: 197 supplement products (+6 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science

No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

Ingredient science — NIH references

NiacinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Record 850033272826 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai