Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 850039286711 · back to the summary
Liquid I.V. Sugar Free Hydration Electrolytes, White Peach, 14 Count
Exact product checkedGTIN 00850039286711 · checked 2026-08-03
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
13listed rows
13separately quantified
0combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 13 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 15 | — | |
| Total Fat | 0 g | — | |
| Sodium | 500 mg | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 5 g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 0 g | — | |
| Includes Added Sugars | 0 g | — | |
| Protein | 0 g | — | |
| Potassium | 370 mg | — | |
| Vitamin C | 62 mcg | — | |
| Niacin | 19.3 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B6 | 1.93 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B12 | 5.79 mcg | — | |
| Pantothenic Acid | 9.6 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out3
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists The LIV Group, Inc. (CORPORATION) in DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 850039286711 to "Sugar Free White Peach" (Liquid IV) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Reviews arrived in a burst, not gradually
The dated series runs from 1,028 written reviews on July 10, 2025 to 1,365 on July 28, 2026. Up to 1,083 written reviews were added within a single ~30-day window — 79% of the total. Sudden bursts are the usual fingerprint of incentivized or bought reviews; a steady climb is not.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing6
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 6 actives sum to 401 mg, which fits inside the ≈13,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
14 servings × 13 g = 182 g, matching the printed net weight 182 g (NET WT. 6.41oz (182g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1,027 on 2025-07-03 to 1,365 on 2026-07-28 (net +338). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850039286711.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 850039286711 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Liquid I.V. |
| Source listing identifier | B0BQ4ZFNZV |
| USPTO brand owner | The LIV Group, Inc. · CORPORATION · DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | 127 Nevada Street, El Segundo, CALIFORNIA 90245, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 stick (13g) |
| Servings per container | 14 |
| Net weight | NET WT. 6.41oz (182g) |
| Pack statement | 14-0.45oz (13g) Sticks |
| Badges printed on pack | Vegan, Keto friendly, CERTIFIED GLUTEN FREE, GFCO, OSMO Lab, OSMO LAB CERTIFIED, NON GMO Project VERIFIED |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 15 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Fat | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 5 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Includes Added Sugars | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Potassium | 370 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin C | 62 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Niacin | 19.3 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B6 | 1.93 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B12 | 5.79 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Pantothenic Acid | 9.6 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“NO ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS” · “SUGAR-FREE” · “= SUPERIOR HYDRATION THAN WATER ALONE” · “SCIENTIFICALLY FORMULATED” · “8 VITAMINS & NUTRIENTS” · “14 ON-THE-GO STICKS” · “Delicate, floral stone fruit with delightful pear and pineapple” · “#1 POWDERED HYDRATION BRAND IN AMERICA”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $27.61 checked Aug 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Official brand domain: www.liquid-iv.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Potassium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Niacin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)
Vitamin B6 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Pantothenic Acid — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (601) · no UL established
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record 850039286711 · built August 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai