Creatine dose matches the studied range
This shows whether the label amount lines up with the cited study context, if that amount is actually present. It is not a dosing recommendation.

Creatine dose matches the studied range
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
This shows whether the label amount lines up with the cited study context, if that amount is actually present. It is not a dosing recommendation.
What is advertised is what the label declares. This checks internal consistency; it is not an independent test of the contents.
You can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.
Only product facts and comparisons earn a card. Pipeline gaps stay collapsed.
The panel declares 5 g creatine per serving, at the top of the commonly studied 3–5 g/day range. This compares declared label numbers with research; it does not verify contents or recommend an amount.
Why it mattersThis shows whether the label amount lines up with the cited study context, if that amount is actually present. It is not a dosing recommendation.
Open the source-linked findingThe listing claims 5 g; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Creatine Monohydrate at 5 g per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
Why it mattersWhat is advertised is what the label declares. This checks internal consistency; it is not an independent test of the contents.
Open the source-linked findingThe panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Why it mattersYou can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.
Open the source-linked findingOpen Food Facts resolves 850042128084 to "Creatine" (Naked) — consistent with this listing.
Why it mattersThe outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Open the source-linked findingPublished sources describe how creatine monohydrate have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet, ISSN position stand on crea…
Why it mattersUse the linked research to check whether the ingredient and outcome you care about are actually connected. Ingredient evidence does not verify this product.
Open the source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.
Is this exact product, not only the brand, covered by the certification record? Evidence that would settle it: exact product registry entry.
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel declares 5 g creatine per serving, at the top of the commonly studied 3–5 g/day range. This compares declared label numbers with research; it does not verify contents or recommend an amount.
label claims 5000 mg/serving — within the range commonly used in research (3–5 g/day maintenance across trials (short loading phases use more)). Sources: NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet, ISSN position stand on creatine (PubMed).
Claimed creatine 5,000.0 mg is 100% of the ≈5,000 mg serving (serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 850042128084) — within physical limits.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Open Food Facts resolves 850042128084 to "Creatine" (Naked) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing claims 5 g; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Creatine Monohydrate at 5 g per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
100 servings × 5 g = 500 g, matching the printed net weight 500 g (NET WT 1.1 LB (500G)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Published sources describe how creatine monohydrate have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet, ISSN position stand on creatine (PubMed).
Naked Whey, Inc appears in NSF’s certified-products registry with 7 certified product(s), but we couldn’t confirm this exact listing is among them. Closest listed product: “NAKED CREATINE®”. Certification covers contents and contaminants — not effectiveness.
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1,010 on 2026-01-31 to 1,285 on 2026-07-12 (net +275). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Answered by the panel: 5 g of the 5 g headline is creatine. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?
The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850042128084.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Look the product up yourself in NSF’s certified-products registry.
Search “Naked Whey, Inc” at info.nsf.org — certification covers contents and contaminants, not effectiveness.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.