lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 850048297593 · back to the summary

Physician's CHOICE Probiotic Gummies with Vitamin D & Prebiotic Fiber

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built August 05, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00850048297593 · checked 2026-08-05

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 0.02 mg vitamin d (as d3 cholecalciferol) claim matches the panel

MARKETING0.02 mg — listing title
PANELVitamin D (as D3 cholecalciferol) 0.02 mg — same amount
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 0.02 mg of vitamin d (as d3 cholecalciferol), and the listing-image panel shows 0.02 mg vitamin d (as d3 cholecalciferol) serving size 2 gummies. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories10
Total Carbohydrate3 g
Dietary Fiber3 g
Total Sugars0 g
Includes Added Sugars0 g
Vitamin D (as D3 cholecalciferol)20 mcg (800 IU)
Sodium10 mg
Bacillus subtilis (1 Billion CFUs)10 mg
Mass check · assumptions shown
3 g listed contents = 0 g major actives + 3 g carbohydrate
Assume 4 pectin gummies × 2.5–3.5 g each = 10–14 g serving. That leaves roughly 0–2 g for water, pectin, sweetener, acid, and flavor. Serving weight is not printed, so this is a warning, not a closed impossibility.

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 0 to 16 between April 9 and July 30, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 8, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

The label says 3 g of vitamin d in 4 gummies — but not what thos

A serving is 4 gummies, and the panel lists 3,000 mg — 3 g — of vitamin d in that serving. What the panel doesn’t give is the one number needed to check it: what a serving weighs. Gummies of this type usually run somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 grams each, which would put 4 of them near 10 to 14 grams. If that holds here, vitamin d would be a high share of the serving’s weight, and that is why we stopped on this number. But we did not weigh these gummies. The 2.5–3.5 gram figure is a general estimate for the format, not a measurement of this product. One published number would settle it: the weight of one gummy, or of a 4-gummy serving. Until then we can’t confirm the 3 g and we can’t dispute it. Nothing here says the product is short — only that the label doesn’t let anyone check. Checked August 5, 2026.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing9

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: JB7, LLC, ENERGIQUE, INC.. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.

No data

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-04-09 to 16 on 2026-07-30 (net +16). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?

Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.

3

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850048297593.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Clinical-evidence claim
“Physician's CHOICE Probiotic Gummies with Vitamin D & Prebiotic Fiber - Sugar Free - 1B CFUs of Clinically Studied Probiotic - Supports Immune & Gut Health for Women & Me”
No evidence located
We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
Quality-testing claim
“…Unmatched Quality: Physician’s Choice Fiber Gummies are 3rd-party tested for safety, purity, and potency.…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Benefit claim
“Physician's CHOICE Probiotic Gummies with Vitamin D & Prebiotic Fiber - Sugar Free - 1B CFUs of Clinically Studied Probiotic - Supports Immune & Gut Health for Women & Me”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Dietary Fiber
shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label
3 g — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID850048297593 — via source listing UPC
BrandPhysician's CHOICE
Source listing identifierB0G9BBTNC8
Retailer listing titlePhysician's CHOICE Probiotic Gummies with Vitamin D & Prebiotic Fiber …
show full title Physician's CHOICE Probiotic Gummies with Vitamin D & Prebiotic Fiber - Sugar Free - 1B CFUs of Clinically Studied Probiotic - Supports Immune & Gut Health for Women & Men - Watermelon Flavor - 60CT
USPTO brand-owner recordJB7, LLC · DELAWARE, USA · registration not stated · 6990 West 38th Avenue, Suite 304, Wheat Ridge, COLORADO 80033, UNITED STATES
USPTO brand-owner recordJB7, LLC · COLORADO, USA; DELAWARE, USA · registration 5545233 · 12365 Huron St. #1800, Westminster, COLORADO 80234, UNITED STATES
USPTO brand-owner recordENERGIQUE, INC. · Iowa, USA · registration not stated · 201 Apple Boulevard, Woodbine, Iowa 51579, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving sizeServing Size 2 Gummies
Servings per container30
Pack statement60 GUMMIES
Badges printed on packTHIRD-PARTY TESTED, VEGETARIAN

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories10 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate3 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Dietary Fiber3 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugars0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Includes Added Sugars0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin D (as D3 cholecalciferol)20 mcg (800 IU)High
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium10 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Bacillus subtilis (1 Billion CFUs)10 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Developed with Doctors” · “0g SUGAR PER SERVING” · “Daily support for: Gut & Immune Health” · “PROBIOTIC SUPPLEMENT” · “WATERMELON FLAVORED WITH OTHER NATURAL FLAVORS” · “From the #1 Probiotic Brand” · “A tastier, cleaner probiotic gummy that works” · “CLINICALLY-STUDIED 1 BILLION CFUs PROBIOTIC”

Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$16.97 checked Aug 05, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Brand store physicianschoice.com: 31 supplement products (+1 merch items) — a single-category catalog.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 850048297593 · built August 05, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai