lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 850050224624 · back to the summary

NativePath Collagen Peptides Stick Packs, Grass-Fed

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built July 27, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00850050224624 · checked 2026-07-27

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 10 g hydrolyzed bovine collagen (types i & iii) claim matches the panel

MARKETING10 g — listing title
PANELHydrolyzed Bovine Collagen (Types I & III) 10 g — same amountHydrolyzed Bovine Collagen (Types I & III) 10 g
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 10 g of hydrolyzed bovine collagen (types i & iii), and the listing-image panel shows 10 g hydrolyzed bovine collagen (types i & iii) 10 g (about 1 stick). Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories35
Protein9 g
Sodium40 mg
Hydrolyzed Bovine Collagen (Types I & III)10 g

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 44 to 129 between June 25, 2025 and July 15, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 15, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing10

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: NATIVEPATH, LLC, Lexicon Digital Media Group. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.

No data

Listed amounts fit the serving

Technical check only: the panel’s 1 actives sum to 10,000 mg, which fits inside the ≈10,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

30 servings × 10 g = 300 g, matching the printed net weight 300 g (NET WT 10.6 oz (300 g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how collagen peptides have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 42 on 2025-06-23 to 129 on 2026-07-15 (net +87). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Answered by the panel: 10 g of the 10 g headline is collagen. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?

The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.

2

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

3

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850050224624.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…GRASS-FED & CLEAN: Pasture-raised bovine collagen, third-party tested.…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Manufacturing claim
“…GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE GMP CERTIFIE”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Benefit claim
“…DAILY SUPPORT, ANYWHERE: Supports skin elasticity, hair fullness, nail strength, and joint comfort — the convenient way to stay consistent with collagen on busy and trav”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Hydrolyzed Bovine Collagen (Types I & III)
shaded = doses used in studies (2.5 g–15 g) · bar = this label
10 g — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID850050224624 — via source listing UPC
BrandNativePath
Source listing identifierB0DPNH1PTL
Retailer listing titleNativePath Collagen Peptides Stick Packs, Grass-Fed, 30 Count…
show full title NativePath Collagen Peptides Stick Packs, Grass-Fed, 30 Count
USPTO brand-owner recordNATIVEPATH, LLC · DELAWARE, USA · registration 6960986 · STE 184, 1200 South Brand Blvd, Glendale, CALIFORNIA 91204, UNITED STATES
USPTO brand-owner recordLexicon Digital Media Group · CALIFORNIA, USA; DELAWARE, USA · registration 5517552 · Suite 120, 15559 Union Street, Los Gatos, CALIFORNIA 95032, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size10 g (About 1 Stick)
Servings per container30
Net weightNET WT 10.6 oz (300 g)
Pack statement30 Stick Packs
Badges printed on packPALEO, KETO, GMO FREE, DAIRY FREE, GLUTEN FREE, THIRD PARTY TESTED, NON GMO, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE GMP CERTIFIE

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories35 High
clearly legible in the photo
Protein9 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium40 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Hydrolyzed Bovine Collagen (Types I & III)10 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“PREMIUM GRASS-FED, PASTURE-RAISED” · “SUPPORT FOR: BONES, JOINTS, SKIN, HAIR, NAILS, DIGESTION” · “FLAVORLESS • ODORLESS • TASTELESS” · “30 SERVINGS” · “FAST DISSOLVING 10g PER SERVING COLLAGEN PEPTIDES” · “Dietary Supplement” · “10g Per Stick Pack” · “Pure Grass-Fed Collagen Peptides”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$35.99 checked Jul 27, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Brand store nativepath.co: 70 supplement products (+8 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Related research & consistency

collagen peptidesPubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 850050224624 · built July 27, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai