Checked against public sources between July 25 and September 2, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “NAD+ Complex”. The panel lists “NAD+ Complex” (500 mg) as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid, as RiaGev-WS™) | 145 mg |
|---|---|
| NAD+ Complex | 500 mg |
| NAD+ | 450 mg |
| RiaGev-WS™ | 450 mg |
| Flush-Free Niacin Inositol Hexanicotinate | 450 mg |
| Resveratrol | 100 mg |
| Niacin (Vitamin B3) | 450 mg |
| D-Ribose | 230 mg |
| Inositol | 100 mg |
Printed on the package: LAB TESTED · THIRD-PARTY LAB TESTED · GMP CERTIFIED FACILITY · AAALAC
We read 9 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
1 promise needs a closer look.
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. Under NSF/ANSI 173, NSF lists Toniiq, LLC products, including Resveratrol, but not this exact SKU. IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Written reviews rose from 96 to 153 between August 20, 2025 and August 24, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 11, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
1608 S. Ashland Ave., Chicago, ILLINOIS 70517, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
$0.93 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026
View on Amazon ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.