full reportFull record · 850055966062 · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 4 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic (As) | < 0.01 ppm | — | |
| Cadmium (Cd) | < 0.01 ppm | — | |
| Lead (Pb) | < 0.02 ppm | — | |
| Mercury (Hg) | < 0.01 ppm | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
200 servings × 5 g = 1000 g, matching the printed net weight 1000 g (NET WT. 2.2LBS (1000G)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 36 on 2025-07-26 to 65 on 2026-07-08 (net +29). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850055966062.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…Creatine Monohydrate Powder, Pure Creatine Powder, Made in USA, 3rd Party Lab Tested, 5g Per Serving, Scoop Included, No Fillers, No Added Flavor (Unflavored, 1000g / 20” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…💲Highest Quality at Lowest Prices: Our creatine monohydrate powder offers exceptional value with the highest quality ingredients sourced and packaged in the USA by a GMP” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…Creatine Monohydrate Powder, Pure Creatine Powder, Made in USA, 3rd Party Lab Tested, 5g Per Serving, Scoop Included, No Fillers, No Added Flavor (Unflavored, 1000g / 20” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 850055966062 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | It's Just! |
| Source listing identifier | B0CK9CNP9N |
| Retailer listing title | It's Just! - Creatine Monohydrate Powder, Pure Creatine Powder, Made i… show full titleIt's Just! - Creatine Monohydrate Powder, Pure Creatine Powder, Made in USA, 3rd Party Lab Tested, 5g Per Serving, Scoop Included, No Fillers, No Added Flavor (Unflavored, 1000g / 200 Servings) |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 Scoop (5g) |
| Servings per container | 200 |
| Net weight | NET WT. 2.2LBS (1000G) |
| Badges printed on pack | GMP COMPLIANT FACILITY, GMP, THIRD-PARTY LAB TESTED, Non-GMO |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Arsenic (As) | < 0.01 ppm | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Cadmium (Cd) | < 0.01 ppm | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Lead (Pb) | < 0.02 ppm | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Mercury (Hg) | < 0.01 ppm | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Nothing Else!” · “UNFLAVORED DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “100 SERVINGS” · “5G PER SCOOP” · “1 INGREDIENT” · “USA SOURCED, PACKAGED, & TESTED” · “MADE IN USA FROM DOMESTIC INGREDIENTS” · “THIRD PARTY LAB TESTED IN THE USA”
Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $34.99 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — creatine monohydrate · Grade A
Record 850055966062 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai