“Calcium 82 mg per serving”
Evidence →The label promises 82 mg per serving. The panel says 82 mg. They match.
Exact product checked · GTIN 00850056167536Micro Ingredients · checked Sep 2, 2026 · on sale since May 9, 2024🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · DPL Trading, Inc. · California, USAPackage says distributed by: Micro Ingredients · 4382 Mission Blvd, Montclair, CA 91763
Quick read · Micro Ingredients
Micro Ingredients Electrolytes Powder, 2lbs (139 Servings)
Checked against public sources between July 26 and September 2, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Listing brand: Micro Ingredients · package: More of What Matters™. Ownership and outside records for the listing brand may not describe the branding printed on the package. Confirm the package identity before treating them as the same brand.
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified16 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$0.28per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?Claimed — no lab or certificate found
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸DPL Trading, Inc.corporation · California, USA
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?✓No recalls found
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
2✓ checked out1? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Total Fat | 0g |
|---|---|
| Saturated Fat | 0g |
| Trans Fat | 0g |
| Cholesterol | 0mg |
| Sodium | 10mg |
| Potas. | 1,000mg |
| Magnesium | 100mg |
| Chloride | 15mg |
| Total Carbohydrate | 0g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g |
| Total Sugars | 0g |
| Includes Added Sugars | 0g |
| Protein | 0g |
| Vit. D | 0mcg |
| Calcium | 82mg |
| Iron | 0mg |
Printed on the package: THIRD PARTY LAB TESTED · cGMP · GMO FREE · THIRD PARTY TESTED · zero sugar · zero calories · cGMP FACILITY · Vitamin Angels
We read 16 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
2 promises check out. 1 could not be fully confirmed from public sources.
✓Matches the label2
“Magnesium 100 mg per serving”
Evidence →The label promises 100 mg per serving. The panel says 100 mg. They match.
?Couldn’t verify independently1
“PARTY LAB”
Evidence →No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Quick read · 2 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Needs explanationWho is behind it?
Listing brand: Micro Ingredients · package: More of What Matters™
Ownership and outside records for the listing brand may not describe the branding printed on the package. Confirm the package identity before treating them as the same brand.
Evidence and sources
The exact product listing names “Micro Ingredients,” while the saved package/panel image reads “More of What Matters™.” This can reflect a product line, catalog error, changed listing, or different packaging; it does not prove substitution. …
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedCan you trust the review pattern?
Reviews rose from 128 to 304 between August 15, 2025 and August 16, 2026 — no sudden jump.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews rose from 128 to 304 between August 15, 2025 and August 16, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 37, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
DPL Trading, Inc.Corporation · exact supplement-class mark for MICRO INGREDIENTS
Filed address
4951 Holt Blvd, Suite A, Montclair, California 91763, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$38.99
$0.28 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Exact UPC/GTIN match$38.99
$0.28 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026
View on iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 2 sellers at the same price at check time.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.