LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 00850059338285ForestLeaf · checked Sep 2, 2026 · on sale since Jan 17, 2025
Quick read · ForestLeaf

Pure Magnesium Glycinate 400mg Serving

Checked against public sources between July 26 and September 2, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

180capsules · 60 servings

Does the marketing hold up?

Testing claimed — documentation not found. The observed listing and a related brand product page both claim third-party testing. Neither names the laboratory or links a product- or lot-specific report. …

Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified1 ingredient listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$0.45per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?Claimed — no lab or certificate found
Who’s behind it?No exact match in USPTO
Is it the real thing?Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?No recalls found

“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.

2◖ partly confirmed2? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 3 Capsules · 60 servings per container

Magnesium (as Magnesium Glycinate)400mg

Printed on the package: VEGAN FRIENDLY · MADE IN USA · TESTED FOR ABSORPTION · FAMILY OWNED · LAB TESTED 3RD PARTY · NON GMO · NO DAIRY · NO EGG

We read 1 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Marketing claims, checked

The checks, one by one

The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.

Partly confirmed2

“HEALTH & BONE SUPPORT - Doctors know best, magnesium glycinate is one of the gentlest supplements on the”

Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

Evidence →
“supplement is made in the USA in a GMP compliant facility and independently lab verified and tested for”

“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

Evidence →

Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.

?Couldn’t verify independently2

“supplement is made in the USA in a GMP compliant facility and independently lab verified and tested for”

“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.

Evidence →
“tested for”

No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page repeats a testing claim but names no issuer; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.

Evidence →

We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.

Quick read · 1 useful finding

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

CheckedCan you trust the review pattern?

Reviews rose from 11 to 23 between September 23, 2025 and August 16, 2026 — no sudden jump.

A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.

Evidence and sources

Written reviews rose from 11 to 23 between September 23, 2025 and August 16, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 2, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 5
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
  • Panel amounts still need a clearer source image.
  • We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
  • Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
  • Brand ownership is not settled in this record.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.

Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

Amazon

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$26.99

$0.45 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026

View on Amazon ↗

Brand website

Official product-page candidate · UPC absent
$19.95

Official shopping lead; excluded from exact price comparisons.

Magnesium Glycinate · 90. Confirm the package UPC/GTIN before buying.

Check brand website ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Walmart ↗

Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.

The brand-page price is shown as a shopping lead only. It is excluded from the exact-product price difference because the page does not publish this record's matching UPC/GTIN.

The observed listing and related brand page repeat 400 mg. That confirms cross-page consistency of the published claim, not the product contents.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want to inspect the evidence?

The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.