No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.

NatureBell Testosterone for Men, 240 Capsules
Checked against public sources on August 16, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “Natural Booster Proprietary Blend”. A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Vitamin B6 (as pyridoxine HCl) | 10 mg |
|---|---|
| Zinc (as zinc picolinate) | 25 mg |
| D-Aspartic Acid | 550 mg |
| Tribulus Terrestris Extract (Tribulus terrestris) (fruit) | 200 mg |
| Horny Goat Weed Extract (Epimedium sagittatum) (leaf) | 150 mg |
| Tongkat Ali Extract (Eurycoma longifolia) (root) | 100 mg |
| Maca Root Powder (Lepidium meyenii) (root) | 100 mg |
| Natural Booster Proprietary Blend | 155 mg |
| Performance Booster Proprietary Blend | 100 mg |
| Boron (as boron citrate) | 10 mg |
Printed on the package: Non-GMO · Gluten Free · Third Party Tested · cGMP Compliant · Vitamin Angels
We read 10 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
?Couldn’t verify independently1
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Marketing language, not scored
Max Strength 20-in-1 Testosterone Booster for Men*
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Category context: sexual-enhancement products carry documented FDA risk
This is category history, not proof about this product, but it changes how much unsupported claims deserve to be trusted.
Evidence and sources
FDA's health-fraud program documents sexual-enhancement products as the most common supplement category found to contain undeclared prescription-drug ingredients. This is a category-level documented fact from FDA's public database — not a test result for this specific product. …
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 4
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
- No dated review-history series is on file yet.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
4951 Holt Blvd, Suite C, Montclair, California 91763, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 10 mg of boron per serving. Studies we found used 3 mg–10 mg a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
The panel lists 100 mg of tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia) per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–400 mg a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
The panel lists 100 mg of maca root per serving. Studies we found used 1.5 g–3 g a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
The panel lists 200 mg of tribulus terrestris per serving. Studies we found used 250 mg–1.5 g a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.17 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 16, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built August 16, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.