LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 00850064950724BAREBELLS · checked Jul 21, 2026 · on sale since Jun 27, 2025🌍 USPTO wordmark owner · Barebells Functional Foods AB · SWEDENPackage says manufactured for: BAREBELLS FUNCTIONAL FOODS LLC · MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 USA.
Quick read · BAREBELLS

Barebells Protein Bars People's Choice Variety…

Checked against public sources between July 21 and July 24, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

12pack · 3 servings
4.7 / 5rating at observation
577visible ratings

Does the marketing hold up?

577 ratings on a brand first claimed March 4, 2026. The sales implied by the review count are worth weighing against how new or little-known the brand is. This is a plausibility question, not a fake-review verdict.

Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified16 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$10.66per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?🌍Barebells Functional Foods ABcorporation · SWEDEN
Is it the real thing?Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?No recalls found
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 1 bar · 3 servings per container · 12 X 1.94 oz

Calories200
Total Fat7 g
Saturated Fat3.5 g
Trans Fat0 g
Cholesterol10 mg
Sodium150 mg
Total Carbohydrate20 g
Dietary Fiber3 g
Total Sugars1 g
Includes Added Sugars0 g
Sugar Alcohols6 g
Protein20 g
Vitamin D0 mcg
Calcium150 mg
Iron1.9 mg
Potassium170 mg

Printed on the package: GMO FREE · FUNCTIONAL FOODS

We read 16 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Quick read · 3 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Needs explanationCan you trust the review pattern?

577 ratings on a brand first claimed March 4, 2026.

The sales implied by the review count are worth weighing against how new or little-known the brand is. This is a plausibility question, not a fake-review verdict.

Evidence and sources

577 ratings, at a typical 1–2% review rate, implies roughly 28,850–57,700 units sold since the brand's first claimed use in March 4, 2026. Worth weighing whether that pace is plausible for a new, unknown label. The count is a documented fact; the conclusion is yours.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedIs the label honest?

Every ingredient shows its amount · 16 ingredients listed.

Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedCan you trust the review pattern?

Reviews rose from 5 to 151 between July 29, 2025 and September 1, 2026 — no sudden jump.

A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.

Evidence and sources

Written reviews rose from 5 to 151 between July 29, 2025 and September 1, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 31, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 2
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
  • We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?
🌍
Barebells Functional Foods ABCorporation · exact supplement-class mark for BAREBELLS
AssignmentsNo transfers recorded

Filed address
Box 5024, SE-102 41 STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN

USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.

Background reading

What the research says about these amounts

Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.

The panel lists 3 g of prebiotic fiber (inulin-type) per serving. Studies we found used 3 g–10 g a day, so this sits inside that range.

0studied 3 g–10 g

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

Amazon

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$31.99

4.7/5 · 577 ratings

$10.66 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026

View on Amazon ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Walmart ↗

Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want to inspect the evidence?

The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.