“Sodium 590 mg per serving”
Evidence →The label promises 590 mg per serving. The panel says 590 mg. They match.
Exact product checked · GTIN 00850068517442ZestLytes · checked Jul 30, 2026 · on sale since Aug 27, 2025🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · UVITAL ZONEJUMP INC · California, USA
Quick read · ZestLytes
40 Sticks Salty Fruit Sugar Free Electrolyte Hydration Packets…
Checked against public sources on July 30, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
40sticks · 40 servings
Does the marketing hold up?
Every ingredient shows its amount · 14 ingredients listed. Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Is the dose real?✓Listing and panel agreeboth say 27 mg of Magnesium
What a serving costs$0.37per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?NSF seal printed on the labelwe read it off the package photo; not confirmed in NSF’s registry
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸UVITAL ZONEJUMP INCcorporation · California, USA
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?✓No recalls found
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
1✓ checked out1◖ partly confirmedno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Calories | 10 |
|---|---|
| Total Fat | 0 g |
| Sodium | 590 mg |
| Total Carbohydrate | 3 g |
| Total Sugars | 0 g |
| Includes Added Sugars | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Potassium | 330 mg |
| Vitamin C | 75 mg |
| Niacin | 11.4 mg |
| Vitamin B6 | 1.7 mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.6 mcg |
| Pantothenic acid | 4.1 mg |
| Magnesium | 27 mg |
Printed on the package: Non-GMO Project Verified · NSF · cGMP · HALAL · KOSHER · EUROFINS
We read 14 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
1 promise checks out. 1 could not be fully confirmed from public sources.
✓Matches the label1
◐Partly confirmed1
“to fight dehydration fast and keep muscles firing during 1–2 hour high-intensity sessions—from marathons and team sports to HIIT, cycling, hiking,…”
Evidence →Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
Quick read · 2 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
CheckedIs the label honest?
Every ingredient shows its amount · 14 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedCan you trust the review pattern?
Reviews rose from 0 to 202 between November 11, 2025 and July 28, 2026 — no sudden jump.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews rose from 0 to 202 between November 11, 2025 and July 28, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 40, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 2
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
UVITAL ZONEJUMP INCCorporation · exact supplement-class mark for ZESTLYTES
Filed address
1801 FLOWER AVE C8, DUARTE, California 91010, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Background reading
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 27 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits below that range.
0studied 200 mg–420 mg
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$14.99
$0.37 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 30, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built August 02, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.