Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists DPL Trading, Inc. (CORPORATION) in California, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full record · 850069023645 · back to the summary
Liver Advanced+, 240 Veggie Capsules | 20-in-1 Complex with Milk Thistle
Exact product checkedGTIN 00850069023645 · checked 2026-07-21
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
12listed rows
11separately quantified
1combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes 11 separately ingredients with amounts and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Choline (as choline bitartrate) | 24 mg | — | |
| Zinc (as zinc picolinate) | 30 mg | — | |
| Selenium (as selenium citrate) | 100 mcg | — | |
| Milk Thistle Extract (Silybum marianum) (seed) | 200 mg | — | |
| Astragalus Extract (Astragalus membranaceus) (root) | 100 mg | — | |
| Dandelion Extract (Taraxacum officinale) (root) | 100 mg | — | |
| Artichoke Extract (Cynara scolymus) (leaf) | 50 mg | — | |
| Turmeric Extract (Curcuma longa) (root) | 50 mg | — | |
| Beet Extract (Beta vulgaris) (root) | 50 mg | — | |
| Burdock Extract (Arctium lappa) (root) | 30 mg | — | |
| Advanced Proprietary Blend | 550 mg | — | |
| N-Acetyl L-Cysteine (NAC), Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD), Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA), Glutathione, TUDCA, Berberine HCI (Berberis aristata) (root), Schisandra (Schisandra chinensis) (fruit) (from 20:1 extract), Chicory Extract (Cichorium intybus) (root), Chanca Piedra Extract (Phyllanthus Niruri) (herb) | — | — | |
| Black Pepper Extract (Piper nigrum) (fruit) | 5 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out2
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 80 to 138 between September 30, 2025 and August 26, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 15, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing8
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how turmeric / curcumin, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Turmeric, PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 73 on 2025-09-06 to 138 on 2026-08-26 (net +65). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie
The package says distributed by: Micro Ingredients, 4382 Mission Blvd Montclair, CA 91763. USPTO names DPL Trading, Inc. as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
3
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
4
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850069023645.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…3RD PARTY CERTIFIED FOR PURITY & POTENCY…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page repeats a testing claim but names no issuer; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Origin claim “…MADE IN USA GLOBAL INGREDIENTS…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Turmeric Extract (Curcuma longa) (root) | shaded = doses used in studies (500 mg–2 g) · bar = this label | 50 mg — below the studied range |
| Zinc (as zinc picolinate) | shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label | 30 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
- zinc — daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 850069023645 |
| Brand | Micro Ingredients |
| Source listing identifier | B0DVM7GKC2 |
| Retailer listing title | Liver Advanced+, 240 Veggie Capsules | 20-in-1 Complex with Milk Thist… show full titleLiver Advanced+, 240 Veggie Capsules | 20-in-1 Complex with Milk Thistle, Dandelion, NAD, NAC, ALA, TUDCA, Glutathione, Artichoke, Turmeric, & Astragalus | Non-GMO, Gluten Free |
| USPTO brand owner | DPL Trading, Inc. · CORPORATION · California, USA |
| Owner filed address | 4951 Holt Blvd, Suite A, Montclair, California 91763, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size 2 Vegetarian Capsules |
| Servings per container | 120 |
| Pack statement | 240 Vegetarian Capsules |
| Badges printed on pack | MADE IN USA GLOBAL INGREDIENTS, 3RD PARTY CERTIFIED FOR PURITY & POTENCY, MANUFACTURED IN A cGMP FACILITY, GMO free, Dietary Supplement, Non-GMO, Gluten Free, MADE IN USA WITH GLOBAL INGREDIENTS |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Choline (as choline bitartrate) | 24 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Zinc (as zinc picolinate) | 30 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Selenium (as selenium citrate) | 100 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Milk Thistle Extract (Silybum marianum) (seed) | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Astragalus Extract (Astragalus membranaceus) (root) | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Dandelion Extract (Taraxacum officinale) (root) | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Artichoke Extract (Cynara scolymus) (leaf) | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Turmeric Extract (Curcuma longa) (root) | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Beet Extract (Beta vulgaris) (root) | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Burdock Extract (Arctium lappa) (root) | 30 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Advanced Proprietary Blend | 550 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| N-Acetyl L-Cysteine (NAC), Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Black Pepper Extract (Piper nigrum) (fruit) | 5 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“milk thistle, astragalus, NAD+, NAC, ALA, TUDCA, glutathione, berberine, dandelion, artichoke” · “Dietary Supplement” · “advanced formula” · “20-in-1” · “Free of: Wheat, gluten, soy, dairy & tree nuts.” · “Keep out of the reach of children.” · “Keep in a cool, dry place.” · “CALIFORNIA WARNING: Risk of cancer and reproductive harm from exposure to lead.”
Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Brand store www.microingredients.com: 164 supplement products (+86 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Choline — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (7,299) · UL 3500 mg (adults)
Zinc — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)
Selenium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,481) · UL 400 mcg (adults)
Turmeric — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,288) · botanical; rare hepatotoxicity reports
Niacin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
turmeric / curcumin — NIH NCCIH — Turmeric · PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine · WebMD: turmeric · ClinicalTrials.gov — 286 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: plain curcumin absorbs poorly — most positive trials pair it with piperine (black pepper) or a bioavailability-enhanced form.
zinc — NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 850069023645 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai