The label promises 1,000 mg per serving. The panel says 1,000 mg. They match.

Venture Pal High Sodium Sugar-Free Electrolytes Powder…
Checked against public sources on August 4, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Testing claimed — documentation not found. The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. …
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Calories | 0 |
|---|---|
| Total Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated Fat | 0 g |
| Trans Fat | 0 g |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg |
| Sodium | 1000 mg |
| Total Carbohydrate | 1 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0 g |
| Total Sugars | 0 g |
| Includes Added Sugars | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Vitamin D | 0 mcg |
| Calcium | 0 mg |
| Iron | 0 mg |
| Potassium | 200 mg |
| Vitamin C | 94 mg |
| Magnesium | 60 mg |
Printed on the package: Clinicians' Choice · Verified by frontrowMD · NOTHING DODGY · VEGAN · KETO FRIENDLY · GLUTEN FREE · SOY FREE · DAIRY FREE
We read 17 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The checks, one by one
1 promise checks out against the label or linked source.
✓Matches the label1
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The observed listing says it is tested, but names no lab or certifier.
A testing badge without an issuer or report is a marketing claim, not evidence. Ask for the lab name and lot-specific report.
Evidence and sources
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingRegistered owner records: Fujian SPD E-commerce Co.,ltd. (limited company (ltd.); CHINA) · VENTURE PAL CORPORATION
The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
Evidence and sources
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Fujian SPD E-commerce Co.,ltd. (limited company (ltd.); CHINA), VENTURE PAL CORPORATION. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its amount · 17 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingReaching a studied dose costs about $32/month
Comparing cost at a research-relevant amount shows how quickly the package is used and what the routine actually costs.
Evidence and sources
At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (200–420 mg), this product runs roughly $32 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingReviews rose from 6 to 47 between July 18, 2025 and July 21, 2026 — no sudden jump.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews rose from 6 to 47 between July 18, 2025 and July 21, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 8, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
The brand has 2 exact supplement-class records
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
CHINA; CALIFORNIA, USA · Registration 7545759
CHINA); A8,Unit 3,8/F, Bldg D, Xiamen International Shipping Center, Xiamen, 361000, CHINA
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Vitamin preparations; glucose dietary supplements; mineral dietary supplements; nutritional supplements; protein dietary supplements; vitamin supplement patches.; IC 032: Fruit drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; fruit-based soft drinks flavored with tea; non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; powders for making energy drinks; seltzer water; soft drinks; sports drinks containing electrolytes; sports drinks, namely, energy drinks; sports drinks, namely, performance drinks; sports drinks, namely, recovery drinks; water beverages.
California, USA · Registration application / registration number not stated
727-A KINGSHILL PL, CARSON, California 90746, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 003: Lipsticks; Perfumes; Beauty masks; Cosmetic preparations for baths; Deodorants for human beings or for animals; Essential oils; Ethereal oils; Gel eye patches for cosmetic purposes; Serums for cosmetic purposes; Skin hydrators for cosmetic purposes.; IC 005: Amino acids for veterinary purposes; Diapers for pets; Dietary supplements for animals; Eyepatches for medical purposes; Insecticidal animal shampoo; Protein supplements for animals.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 60 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$1.06 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 4, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built August 04, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.