LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 00850069412586Venture Pal · checked Jul 30, 2026 · on sale since Mar 24, 2025USPTO returned 2 exact supplement-class owner records · inspect the identity trail
Quick read · Venture Pal

Venture Pal High Sodium Sugar-Free Electrolytes Powder…

Checked against public sources on July 30, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

30stick · 16 servings

Does the marketing hold up?

Testing claimed — documentation not found. The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. …

Is the dose real?Listing and panel agreeboth say 1,000 mg of Sodium
What a serving costs$1.06per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?USPTO lists 2 owner recordssame brand name, more than one registrant — we don’t choose between them
Is it the real thing?Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?No recalls found
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 1 Stick pack(4.8g) · 16 servings per container · Net Wt. 5.08 oz (144g)

Calories0
Total Fat0 g
Saturated Fat0 g
Trans Fat0 g
Cholesterol0 mg
Sodium1000 mg
Total Carbohydrate1 g
Dietary Fiber0 g
Total Sugars0 g
Includes Added Sugars0 g
Protein0 g
Vitamin D0 mcg
Calcium0 mg
Iron0 mg
Potassium200 mg
Vitamin C94 mg
Magnesium60 mg

Printed on the package: Clinicians' Choice · Verified by frontrowMD · NO SUGAR · 0 CALORIES · NOTHING DODGY · VEGAN · KETO FRIENDLY · GLUTEN FREE

We read 17 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Quick read · 4 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Needs explanationAny trouble in public records?

The observed listing says it is tested, but names no lab or certifier.

A testing badge without an issuer or report is a marketing claim, not evidence. Ask for the lab name and lot-specific report.

Evidence and sources

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Public contextWho is behind it?

Registered owner records: Fujian SPD E-commerce Co.,ltd. (limited company (ltd.); CHINA) · VENTURE PAL CORPORATION

The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.

Evidence and sources

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Fujian SPD E-commerce Co.,ltd. (limited company (ltd.); CHINA), VENTURE PAL CORPORATION. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer…

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedIs the label honest?

Every ingredient shows its amount · 17 ingredients listed.

Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedCan you trust the review pattern?

Reviews rose from 12 to 59 between July 17, 2025 and July 21, 2026 — no sudden jump.

A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.

Evidence and sources

Written reviews rose from 12 to 59 between July 17, 2025 and July 21, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 11, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 3
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
  • We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
  • Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?

The brand has 2 exact supplement-class records

These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.

🇨🇳Fujian SPD E-commerce Co.,ltd. (limited company (ltd.); CHINA)

CHINA; CALIFORNIA, USA · Registration 7545759

CHINA); A8,Unit 3,8/F, Bldg D, Xiamen International Shipping Center, Xiamen, 361000, CHINA

Goods covered by this record

IC 005: Vitamin preparations; glucose dietary supplements; mineral dietary supplements; nutritional supplements; protein dietary supplements; vitamin supplement patches.; IC 032: Fruit drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; fruit-based soft drinks flavored with tea; non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; powders for making energy drinks; seltzer water; soft drinks; sports drinks containing electrolytes; sports drinks, namely, energy drinks; sports drinks, namely, performance drinks; sports drinks, namely, recovery drinks; water beverages.

🇺🇸VENTURE PAL CORPORATION

California, USA · Registration application / registration number not stated

727-A KINGSHILL PL, CARSON, California 90746, UNITED STATES

Goods covered by this record

IC 003: Lipsticks; Perfumes; Beauty masks; Cosmetic preparations for baths; Deodorants for human beings or for animals; Essential oils; Ethereal oils; Gel eye patches for cosmetic purposes; Serums for cosmetic purposes; Skin hydrators for cosmetic purposes.; IC 005: Amino acids for veterinary purposes; Diapers for pets; Dietary supplements for animals; Eyepatches for medical purposes; Insecticidal animal shampoo; Protein supplements for animals.

This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.

Background reading

What the research says about these amounts

Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.

The panel lists 60 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits below that range.

0studied 200 mg–420 mg

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

Amazon

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$16.99

$1.06 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 31, 2026

View on Amazon ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Walmart ↗

Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want to inspect the evidence?

The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built August 02, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.