Checked against public sources on July 25, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
This is category history, not proof about this product, but it changes how much unsupported claims deserve to be trusted.
FDA's health-fraud program documents sexual-enhancement products as the most common supplement category found to contain undeclared prescription-drug ingredients. This is a category-level documented fact from FDA's public database — not a test result for this specific product. So…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
4951 Holt Blvd, Suite A, Montclair, California 91763, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
The label amount is shown beside the ranges used in the linked ingredient studies.
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 4 mg of boron per serving. Studies we found used 3 mg–10 mg a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
$0.36 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 25, 2026
View on Amazon ↗Search results remain not linked to this exact product until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search iHerb ↗Search results remain not linked to this exact product until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Target ↗Search results remain not linked to this exact product until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built July 25, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.