Checked against public sources on August 5, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Headline number is a blend total, not one named ingredient. The listing uses 0.7 g for turmeric. The panel lists turmeric at 0.55 g; the other 150 mg is the rest of the listed blend. Panel addition: Organic Turmeric Powder 550 mg + Turmeric Extract (Curcuma Longa)…
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Organic Turmeric Powder | 550 mg |
|---|---|
| Turmeric Extract (Curcuma Longa) (Root) (Standardized to 95% Curcuminoids) | 150 mg |
| BioPerine Black Pepper Extract (Piper Nigrum) (Fruit) | 5 mg |
Printed on the package: Non GMOs · NO GELATINE · FREE OF ADDED COLOURANTS · Made in USA
We read 3 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
1 promise needs a closer look.
The listing uses 0.7 g for turmeric. The panel lists turmeric at 0.55 g; the other 150 mg is the rest of the listed blend. Panel addition: Organic Turmeric Powder 550 mg + Turmeric Extract (Curcuma Longa) (Root) (Standardized to 95% Curcuminoids) 150 mg = 700 mg. This documents the framing; it does not establish what is inside the product.
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: PURELY HOLISTIC SUPPLEMENTS, LTD, Nu U Nutrition Limited. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
United Kingdom · Registration application / registration number not stated
2 Clifton Moor Business Village, James Nicolson Link, York, Yorkshire, YO304XG, UNITED KINGDOM
IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary supplemental drinks; Dietary food supplements; Vitamins; Vitamin preparations; Health food supplements; Vitamin and mineral supplements; Mineral dietary supplements; Vitamin and mineral preparations for medical use; Mineral preparations for medical purposes; Dietetic foods adapted for medical purposes; Dietetic preparations adapted for medical purposes; Herbal extracts for medical purposes; Medicinal herbal extracts for medical purposes; Enzymes for medical purposes.
UNITED KINGDOM · Registration 5998645
Strensall, 2 Hawthorn Mews, York, North Yorkshire, YO325RR, UNITED KINGDOM
IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements; dietary supplemental drinks; dietary food supplements; dietary supplements and dietetic preparations; dietary supplements consisting of vitamins; vitamins and vitamin preparations; health food supplements made principally of vitamins; health food supplements made principally of minerals; vitamin and mineral preparations; dietary supplements for medical use; food supplements for medical purposes; dietetic products for medical purposes; mineral preparations for medical purposes; herbal extracts for medical purposes; enzymes for medical purposes; Dietetic food preparations adapted for medical purposes.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
The label amount is shown beside the range used in the linked ingredient studies.
550 mg per serving — within the 500–2000 mg/day used in the linked studies.
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 550 mg of turmeric / curcumin per serving. Studies we found used 500 mg–2 g a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
$0.25 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 6, 2026
View on Amazon ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built August 05, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.