Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
The useful read · Purely Holistic
D Mannose with Cranberry
The panel publishes 3 amounts, led by D-Mannose 1.3 g, Hibiscus Flower (Hibiscus sabdariffa) 100 mg.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
What this means for you · The useful read
What the public record can establish
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Panel, decoded
The 1.3 g d-mannose claim matches the panel
MARKETING1.3 g — listing title
PANELD-Mannose 1.3 g — same amountD-Mannose 1.3 g + Hibiscus Flower (Hibiscus sabdariffa) 100 mg
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 1.3 g of d-mannose, and the listing-image panel shows 1.3 g d-mannose 2 capsules. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-Mannose | 1,300 mg | — | |
| Hibiscus Flower (Hibiscus sabdariffa) | 100 mg | — | |
| Cranberry Fruit Extract 4:1 (Vaccinium macrocarpon) | 50 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a declared “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Public ownership records
The brand has 2 exact supplement-class records
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
🇬🇧PURELY HOLISTIC SUPPLEMENTS, LTD
United Kingdom · Registration application / registration number not stated
2 Clifton Moor Business Village, James Nicolson Link, York, Yorkshire, YO304XG, UNITED KINGDOM
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary supplemental drinks; Dietary food supplements; Vitamins; Vitamin preparations; Health food supplements; Vitamin and mineral supplements; Mineral dietary supplements; Vitamin and mineral preparations for medical use; Mineral preparations for medical purposes; Dietetic foods adapted for medical purposes; Dietetic preparations adapted for medical purposes; Herbal extracts for medical purposes; Medicinal herbal extracts for medical purposes; Enzymes for medical purposes.
🇬🇧Nu U Nutrition Limited
UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED KINGDOM · Registration 5998645
Strensall, 2 Hawthorn Mews, York, North Yorkshire, YO325RR, UNITED KINGDOM
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements; dietary supplemental drinks; dietary food supplements; dietary supplements and dietetic preparations; dietary supplements consisting of vitamins; vitamins and vitamin preparations; health food supplements made principally of vitamins; health food supplements made principally of minerals; vitamin and mineral preparations; dietary supplements for medical use; food supplements for medical purposes; dietetic products for medical purposes; mineral preparations for medical purposes; herbal extracts for medical purposes; enzymes for medical purposes; Dietetic food preparations adapted for medical purposes.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product.
What would settle the biggest open question?
Which exact USPTO registrant is tied to this product's brand use? Evidence that would settle it: exact-wordmark ownership record.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out01
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Documented concerns
What needs caution00
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing05
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Review-count history: not available
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: PURELY HOLISTIC SUPPLEMENTS, LTD, Nu U Nutrition Limited. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850086208308.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.