Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 851741008776 · back to the summary
Liquid I.V. Hydration + Immune Electrolytes, Tangerine
Exact product checkedGTIN 00851741008776 · checked 2026-07-25
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
14listed rows
14separately quantified
0combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 14 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 45 | — | |
| Total Fat | 0 g | — | |
| Sodium | 500 mg | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 11 g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 11 g | — | |
| Added Sugars | 11 g | — | |
| Protein | 0 g | — | |
| Potassium | 370 mg | — | |
| Vitamin C | 504 mg | — | |
| Niacin | 19.3 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B6 | 1.93 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B12 | 5.79 mcg | — | |
| Pantothenic Acid | 9.6 mg | — | |
| Zinc | 10.5 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out4
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists The LIV Group, Inc. (CORPORATION) in DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 851741008776 to "Tangerine Immune Support" (Liquid IV) — consistent with this listing.
Reviews accumulated gradually
Written reviews grew from 1045 to 1089 across 2026-02-24 – 2026-07-24 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~15).
Documented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing6
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 8 actives sum to 11,915 mg, which fits inside the ≈16,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
14 servings × 16 g = 224 g, matching the printed net weight 224 g (14-0.56 oz (16g) STICKS - NET WT. 7.90oz (224g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.
Public label filing not saved
This record does not currently hold an matched to this exact product public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1,043 on 2026-02-15 to 1,089 on 2026-07-24 (net +46). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 851741008776.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical-evidence claim “…with an optimized ratio of electrolytes and clinically tested nutrients. EXTRAORDINARY HYDRATION: Hydratio…” | No evidence located We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula | We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product. |
| Benefit claim “…HYDRATION MIX: Hydration Multiplier +Immune Support is a great-tasting, non-GMO electrolyte drin…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Zinc | shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label | 10.5 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
- zinc — daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Brand's own store found — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 851741008776 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Liquid I.V. |
| Source listing identifier | B08J2MPF8R |
| Retailer listing title | Liquid I.V. Hydration + Immune Electrolytes, Tangerine, 14 Count… show full titleLiquid I.V. Hydration + Immune Electrolytes, Tangerine, 14 Count |
| USPTO brand owner | The LIV Group, Inc. · CORPORATION · DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | 127 Nevada Street, El Segundo, CALIFORNIA 90245, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 stick (16g) |
| Servings per container | 14 |
| Net weight | 14-0.56 oz (16g) STICKS - NET WT. 7.90oz (224g) |
| Pack statement | 14 STICKS |
| Badges printed on pack | NON GMO Project VERIFIED, CERTIFIED GLUTEN FREE, OSMOLOS CERTIFIED, VEGAN, SOY FREE, DAIRY FREE |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 45 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Fat | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 11 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | 11 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Added Sugars | 11 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Potassium | 370 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin C | 504 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Niacin | 19.3 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B6 | 1.93 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B12 | 5.79 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Pantothenic Acid | 9.6 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Zinc | 10.5 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“FASTER HYDRATION” · “THAN WATER ALONE” · “SCIENTIFICALLY FORMULATED” · “VITAMINS & NUTRIENTS” · “is zingy and energetic, bursting with notes of orange and kumquat.” · “Liquid I.V. is formulated with an optimized ratio of electrolytes and clinically tested nutrients, turning ordinary wate” · “HYDRATION MULTIPLIER” · “+IMMUNE SUPPORT”
Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $23.15 checked Jul 25, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Potassium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Niacin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)
Vitamin B6 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Pantothenic Acid — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (601) · no UL established
Zinc — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
zinc — NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 851741008776 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai