Advertised health or performance benefit
Evidence →Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Exact product checked · GTIN 852446007767Nested Naturals · observed 2026-07-23Package says distributed by: Nested Naturals Inc. · 250-997 Seymour St
Vancouver, BC,
V6B 3M1,
Quick read · Nested Naturals
Nested Naturals Super Greens Daily Superfood…
Marketing check: 2 remain partly or independently unverified.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
60servings per container
Marketing claims, checked
Does the marketing hold up?
Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.
◐Partly confirmed1
?Couldn’t verify independently1
“Third-party tested”
Evidence →No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Quick read · 5 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Needs explanationAny trouble on the record?
FDA recall appears in this brand's history
An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
Evidence and sources
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Organic By Nature, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2020-02-24: “Firm was notified by supplier that Organic Ground Flaxseed powder was under recall by manufacturer due to unapproved herbicide - H…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingNeeds explanationIs the label honest?
Panel carries documented template or translation artifacts
Template, translation, or duplicate-row artifacts are reasons to trust the printed numbers less until the brand supplies a clean, product-specific panel.
Evidence and sources
The panel carries these quoted observations: “Calories has no unit”. US-market labels are produced under cGMP controls; these are template or translation artifacts worth checking, not proof that the label is fabricated or that the product is unsafe.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingChecks outWho is behind it?
The barcode identity checks out · 852446007767.
The outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Evidence and sources
UPCitemdb resolves 852446007767 to "Super Greens #1 Green Superfood Powder | 100% USDA Organic Non-GMO Vegan Supplem" (Nested Naturals) — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingChecks outWho is behind it?
Registered in NIH's supplement label database (DSLD)
A government label filing makes the declared formula easier to inspect and compare over time.
Evidence and sources
Label #317232 “Super Greens Original Flavor” (Nested Naturals), entered 2024-09-25, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Distributor — Nested Naturals Inc. , Vancouver, BC.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 1
- Panel amounts still need a clearer source image.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$44.95
$0.75 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · observed 2026-07-24T04:26:42.581398+00:00
View on Amazon ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing retained
Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Walmart ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo exact listing retained
Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search iHerb ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out02
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record
Label #317232 “Super Greens Original Flavor” (Nested Naturals), entered 2024-09-25, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Distributor — Nested Naturals Inc. , Vancouver, BC.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
UPCitemdb resolves 852446007767 to "Super Greens #1 Green Superfood Powder | 100% USDA Organic Non-GMO Vegan Supplem" (Nested Naturals) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
What needs caution02
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Panel carries documented template or translation artifacts
The panel carries these quoted observations: “Calories has no unit”. US-market labels are produced under cGMP controls; these are template or translation artifacts worth checking, not proof that the label is fabricated or that the product is unsafe.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing07
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Panel arithmetic needs confirmation
The listing-image panel produced 10,149 mg across 8 actives for an ≈8,000 mg serving. That cannot be reconciled; the physical label or another exact filed document must settle it.
“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is retained, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
FDA recall appears in this brand's history
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Organic By Nature, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2020-02-24: “Firm was notified by supplier that Organic Ground Flaxseed powder was under recall by manufacturer due to unapproved herbicide - Haloxyfop” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “Nested Naturals Super Kids; Superfood Powder Full of Nutrients for Growing Bodies; Whole Food Powder, Net Wt. 7.5 oz (210g), 30 servings; Finished Product Item # FNNKFMSG210G; ” — not necessarily the product on this page. Verify at FDA’s recall database.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
60 servings × 8 g = 480 g, matching the printed net weight 480 g (NET WT 17 OZ (480G)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 30 on 2026-02-14 to 32 on 2026-06-26 (net +2). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 852446007767.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.