lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 852661843751 · back to the summary

Nutrafol Women's Hair Growth Supplements, Ages 18-44

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built July 21, 2026

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Every check we ran

?

Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend

The panel lists “Nutrafol® Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Intake method matches the research

Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (ashwagandha, collagen peptides, zinc). For example, ashwagandha: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract). Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.

UPC independently corroborated

UPCitemdb resolves 852661843751 to "Nutrafol Women's Hair Growth Supplement | Ages 18-44 | Clinically Proven for Vis" (Nutrafol) — consistent with this listing.

No data yet: Trademark owner candidates are ambiguous

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-related marks with the exact brand wordmark and different registrants. The owner is withheld until the product-to-mark identity is pinned down.

No data yet: Review-count history: not available

Marketplace rating 4.2★ across 18,554 ratings. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.

i

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the photos (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

i

Not found in NIH's DSLD label registry

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Clinical-evidence claim
“…Women's Hair Growth Supplements, Ages 18-44, Clinically Tested for Visibly Thicker and Stronger Hair, Derma…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula
No named, citable study of this product or formula was located in public sources. The claim may rest on ingredient-level research rather than a trial of this product.
Professional-endorsement claim
“…ested for Visibly Thicker and Stronger Hair, Dermatologist Recommended - 1 Month Supply 1-MONTH SUPPLY: One (1) bot…”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.
Benefit claim
“…Nutrafol Women Hair Growth Supplements that promote faster-growing, visibly thicker, fuller, str…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
ashwagandhaStudies typically use 250 mg–600 mg. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible.
collagen peptidesStudies typically use 2.5 g–15 g. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible.
Zinc (as Zinc Amino Acid Chelate)
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
25 mg — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Brand's own store found — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID852661843751
BrandNutrafol
Source listing identifierB00LU4CZP8
Retailer listing titleNutrafol Women's Hair Growth Supplements, Ages 18-44, Clinically Teste…
show full title Nutrafol Women's Hair Growth Supplements, Ages 18-44, Clinically Tested for Visibly Thicker and Stronger Hair, Dermatologist Recommended - 1 Month Supply

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size4 Capsules
Servings per container30
Pack statement120 CAPSULES
Badges printed on packNSF CERTIFIED SPORT

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories10 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate1 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin A (as Beta-Carotene)1500 mcg RAEHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C (as Ascorbic Acid)40 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin D (D3 as Cholecalciferol from Algae)62.5 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin E (as d-alpha Tocopherol)3.5 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B12 (as Methylcobalamin)120 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Calcium30 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Iodine (from Organic Kelp)225 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc (as Zinc Amino Acid Chelate)25 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Selenium (as Selenium Amino Acid Chelate)200 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium10 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Potassium30 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin K2 (as Menaquinone-7)50 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Synergen Complex® Plant1.11 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Nutrafol® Blend490 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“HAIR GROWTH NUTRACEUTICAL” · “#1 Dermatologist-Recommended” · “Best-Selling Hair Growth Supplement Brand.” · “Clinically proven to improve hair growth and hair quality.” · “Visibly thicker hair volume” · “Visibly less hair shedding” · “Fast growing, longer and stronger hair” · “Physician-formulated for hair growth in 3-6 months”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin ANIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,699) · UL 3000 mcg (preformed vitamin A (retinol); excludes beta-carotene)

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

Vitamin ENIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,326) · UL 1000 mg (supplemental alpha-tocopherol, adults)

Vitamin B12NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established

CalciumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))

IodineNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (6,462) · UL 1100 mcg (adults)

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

SeleniumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,481) · UL 400 mcg (adults)

PotassiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC

Vitamin KNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,124) · no UL established; interacts with warfarin

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the declared amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

ashwagandhaNIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha · PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial · WebMD: ashwagandha · ClinicalTrials.gov — 78 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract).

collagen peptidesPubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 852661843751 · built July 21, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai