Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 854970007114 · back to the summary
Superieur Sea Mineral Electrolyte Powder, Citrus
Exact product checkedGTIN 00854970007114 · checked 2026-08-02
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
9listed rows
9separately quantified
0combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 9 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 2 g | — | |
| Vitamin C (as Acerola Berry Extract) | 70 mg | — | |
| Calcium (as Tri-Calcium Citrate) | 35 mg | — | |
| Potassium (as Tri-Potassium Citrate) | 160 mg | — | |
| Stevia Leaf Extract | 60 mg | — | |
| Pink Himalayan Sea Salt | 25 mg | — | |
| Bamboo Stem Extract | 25 mg | — | |
| Trace Ionic Sea Minerals | 12 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out2
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists SUPERIEUR, INC. (CORPORATION) in NEW YORK, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Documented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing7
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 7 actives sum to 387 mg, which fits inside the ≈2,800 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
70 servings × 2.8 g = 196 g, matching the printed net weight 196 g (NET.WT. 6.9 oz. (196 g.)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 92 on 2025-09-15 to 104 on 2026-06-14 (net +12). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Barcode record is too sparse to confirm identity
Open Food Facts resolves 854970007114 to "Drink superieur electrolytes" (brand not supplied), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 854970007114.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “…Superieur Electrolyte powder is great for maintaining daily hydration, immune support, mood, and energy.…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 854970007114 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Superieur |
| Source listing identifier | B078KZDMQT |
| Retailer listing title | Superieur Sea Mineral Electrolyte Powder, Citrus, 70 Servings… show full titleSuperieur Sea Mineral Electrolyte Powder, Citrus, 70 Servings |
| USPTO brand owner | SUPERIEUR, INC. · CORPORATION · NEW YORK, USA |
| Owner filed address | 112 Powell Ave., Southampton, NEW YORK 11968, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size: 2.8 grams (approx. 1 scoop) |
| Servings per container | 70 |
| Net weight | NET.WT. 6.9 oz. (196 g.) |
| Pack statement | 70 servings |
| Badges printed on pack | ZERO SUGAR, GMO FREE, GLUTEN FREE, DAIRY FREE, CAFFEINE FREE, ARTIFICIAL FREE, PALEO FRIENDLY, KETO FRIENDLY |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin C (as Acerola Berry Extract) | 70 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Calcium (as Tri-Calcium Citrate) | 35 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Potassium (as Tri-Potassium Citrate) | 160 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Stevia Leaf Extract | 60 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Pink Himalayan Sea Salt | 25 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bamboo Stem Extract | 25 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Trace Ionic Sea Minerals | 12 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“zero sugar” · “best tasting better ingredients” · “with pink Himalayan sea salt & real vitamin C” · “dietary supplement” · “PINK HIMALAYAN SEA SALT” · “IONIC SEA MINERALS” · “ACEROLA BERRY EXTRACTS” · “Food source Vitamin C”
Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $28.99 checked Aug 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Calcium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))
Potassium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record 854970007114 · built August 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai