“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

Nugenix Total-T Ultimate
Checked against public sources on July 27, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “Tesnor™ (proprietary blend of Pomegranate Extract (peel) and”. A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Vitamin D (as cholecalciferol) | 20 mcg |
|---|---|
| D-Aspartic Acid | 3000 mg |
| Tribulus Extract (whole herb and fruit) (95% total saponins) | 750 mg |
| Tesnor™ (proprietary blend of Pomegranate Extract (peel) and Cocoa Extract (bean)) | 400 mg |
| Stinging Nettle Extract (root) | 300 mg |
| Maca Extract (root) | 250 mg |
| Eurycoma longifolia Extract (root) | 150 mg |
| Epimedium Extract (aerial parts)(20% icariins) | 100 mg |
| Diindolylmethane (DIM) | 100 mg |
| Boron (as boron glycinate) | 10 mg |
We read 10 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed2
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
Marketing language, not scored
ADVANCED TOTAL TESTOSTERONE BOOSTING FORMULA
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Category context: sexual-enhancement products carry documented FDA risk
This is category history, not proof about this product, but it changes how much unsupported claims deserve to be trusted.
Evidence and sources
FDA's health-fraud program documents sexual-enhancement products as the most common supplement category found to contain undeclared prescription-drug ingredients. This is a category-level documented fact from FDA's public database — not a test result for this specific product. …
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingRegistered in NIH's supplement label database (DSLD)
A government label filing makes the listed formula easier to inspect and compare over time.
Evidence and sources
Label #199861 “Nugenix Ultimate Testosterone” (Nugenix), entered 2019-02-25, with the full Supplement Facts on file. Company on file: Distributor — Direct Digital, LLC, Charlotte, NC.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
- No dated review-history series is on file yet.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
615 S. College St. #1300, Charlotte, NORTH CAROLINA 28202, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 10 mg of boron per serving. Studies we found used 3 mg–10 mg a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
The panel lists 150 mg of tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia) per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–400 mg a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
The panel lists 250 mg of maca root per serving. Studies we found used 1.5 g–3 g a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
The panel lists 750 mg of tribulus terrestris per serving. Studies we found used 250 mg–1.5 g a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$2.98 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 28, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built July 27, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.