lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 855861006070 · back to the summary

Hair Growth Vitamins for Women & Men for Faster Hair Growth, Vegan, 60 Capsules

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built September 03, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00855861006070 · checked 2026-07-24

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

UPCitemdb resolves 855861006070 to "HairAnew (Unique Hair Growth Vitamins with Biotin) - Tested - for Hair Skin & N" (Naturenetics) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Wedo Digital Marketing LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CORPORATION) in DELAWARE, USA; NEVADA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing5

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math

The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.

No data

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 8,051 on 2025-08-06 to 7,829 on 2026-08-20 (net -222). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Can you send a clear photo of the full Supplement Facts panel?

It’s the one part of the label required to state what’s inside and how much. A seller who won’t show it before purchase is asking for trust the label would have earned.

3

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

4

Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?

“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 855861006070.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…BEAUTY THAT MATCHES YOUR VALUES - 100% clean vegan hair vitamins, free from fish, shellfish, gelatin, gluten, sugar; made in USA with select ingredients from around the ”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Origin claim
“…BEAUTY THAT MATCHES YOUR VALUES - 100% clean vegan hair vitamins, free from fish, shellfish, gelatin, gluten, sugar; made in USA with select ingredients from around the ”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
Benefit claim
“…YOUR NAILS WILL THANK YOU TOO - Hair skin and nails vitamins in one; many customers report stronger nails and healthier skin as a bonus; Biotin and B-vitamins support ke”
Not checked yet
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Supplement Facts visible in photos — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID855861006070 — via source listing UPC
BrandNaturenetics
Source listing identifierB00I65AGHI
Retailer listing titleHair Growth Vitamins for Women & Men for Faster Hair Growth, Vegan, 60…
show full title Hair Growth Vitamins for Women & Men for Faster Hair Growth, Vegan, 60 Capsules - 11 Ingredients & 5000mcg Biotin for Thicker Fuller Stronger Locks + Skin & Nail Health - Naturenetics HairAnew
USPTO brand ownerWedo Digital Marketing LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CORPORATION · DELAWARE, USA; NEVADA, USA
Owner filed addressSuite 100, 23 Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, CALIFORNIA 92660, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Pack statement60 CAPSULES
Badges printed on packVEGAN, 3RD PARTY TESTED, GLUTEN FREE, NON GMO, VEGA, THIRD PARTY TESTED, 100% Vegan, ZERO SUGAR, FOR ALL HAIR TYPES, New Look

No Supplement Facts panel appears in the listing photos — the full per-ingredient table isn't shown to buyers before purchase. Recorded as a transparency gap, not a strike.

Claims printed on the packaging:

“New Look” · “SAME GREAT PRODUCT” · “Supporting hair, skin & nails since 2014*” · “11 ACTIVE INGRED” · “100% Satisfaction or your money back!” · “Changing your hair game forever” · “Thicker Fuller Hair You Can Actually See” · “Supports Healthy Hair Growth*”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$33.71 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Brand store www.naturenetics.com: 9 supplement products — a single-category catalog.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science

No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

Record 855861006070 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai