Marketing check: 2 remain partly or independently unverified.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 24, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.
Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label claims 0.08 mg/serving — below the range commonly used in research (one randomized dose-response trial used 300–1,800 mg/day of EPA + DHA; omega-3 study doses vary widely).
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Template, translation, or duplicate-row artifacts are reasons to trust the printed numbers less until the brand supplies a clean, product-specific panel.
The panel carries these quoted observations: “Calories has no unit”. US-market labels are produced under cGMP controls; these are template or translation artifacts worth checking, not proof that the label is fabricated or that the product is unsafe.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingYou can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingA government label filing makes the declared formula easier to inspect and compare over time.
Label #81406 “Wild Alaskan Fish Oil Peak EPA” (Wiley's Finest ), entered 2017-12-22, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Manufacturer — Wiley's Finest, Coshocton, OH, 43812.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.
The panel declares 500 mg EPA + DHA per serving, within one studied 300–1800 mg/day context. The fish-oil concentrate total is not substituted for EPA + DHA.
$0.60 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · observed 2026-07-24T06:26:59.557724+00:00
View on Amazon ↗Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search iHerb ↗Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Target ↗Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel declares 500 mg EPA + DHA per serving (1 Softgel). One randomized dose-response trial used 300–1,800 mg/day; omega-3 studies vary widely. This is research context, not a recommendation or safety verdict.
Label #81406 “Wild Alaskan Fish Oil Peak EPA” (Wiley's Finest ), entered 2017-12-22, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Manufacturer — Wiley's Finest, Coshocton, OH, 43812.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The panel carries these quoted observations: “Calories has no unit”. US-market labels are produced under cGMP controls; these are template or translation artifacts worth checking, not proof that the label is fabricated or that the product is unsafe.
label claims 0.08 mg/serving — below the range commonly used in research (one randomized dose-response trial used 300–1,800 mg/day of EPA + DHA; omega-3 study doses vary widely). A lower dose is not necessarily useless — but it is not the amount the research used. Sources: NIH ODS — Omega-3 Fatty Acids fact sheet, PubMed dose-response trial.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how omega-3 have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Omega-3 Fatty Acids fact sheet, PubMed dose-response trial.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 55 on 2026-02-09 to 60 on 2026-07-16 (net +5). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Why is the omega-3 (EPA + DHA) amount below the dose used in published research?
There can be good answers — a more bioavailable form, a different intended use. Ask for the reasoning and any data behind it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 857188004340.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 24, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.