LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
What checks out · Toniiq

Toniiq NSF Certified Ultra High Purity Resveratrol Capsules

The panel publishes 1 amounts, led by Resveratrol 600 mg.

Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

What this means for you · What checks out

What the record confirms

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Specific fact confirmed

Testing claim names a recognized certifier

A named certifier/laboratory appears in the listing (registry cross-check pending).

Specific fact confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Toniiq LLC (['LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY', 'LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY']) in ['MICHIGAN, USA', 'WYOMING, USA'] for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does …

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

1declared rows
1separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 1 declared row. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Resveratrol600 mg

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Public ownership record
🇺🇸
Toniiq LLC['Limited Liability Company', 'Limited Liability Company'] · exact mark owner for TONIIQ

1608 S. Ashland Ave., Chicago, ILLINOIS 70517, UNITED STATES

Registered2018-07-10
AssignmentsYes

Filed address
1608 S. Ashland Ave., Chicago, ILLINOIS 70517, UNITED STATES

This is the USPTO owner of the brand wordmark. It tells a shopper who is behind the brand, but does not by itself identify the manufacturer or prove where this product was made.

Review history
/ 5
not shownvisible ratings

Review counts rose gradually. Written-review counts rose from 115 to 119 across the observed period. That describes count movement, not review authenticity or product quality. A variation family may share some public counts.

Keepa exact-listing history · counts do not prove authenticity · variation family may share counts

What would settle the biggest open question?

Is this exact product, not only the brand, covered by the certification record? Evidence that would settle it: exact product registry entry.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out03

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Testing claim names a recognized certifier

A named certifier/laboratory appears in the listing (registry cross-check pending).

Confirmed

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Toniiq LLC (['LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY', 'LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY']) in ['MICHIGAN, USA', 'WYOMING, USA'] for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution00

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing06

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math

The retained listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.

No data

Certified by NSF — contents and contaminants checked

Toniiq, LLC appears in NSF’s certified-products registry with 4 certified product(s), but we couldn’t confirm this exact listing is among them. Closest listed product: “Resveratrol”. Certification covers contents and contaminants — not effectiveness.

No data

No label filed with NIH's public catalog

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 115 on 2026-01-28 to 119 on 2026-06-16 (net +4). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

3

Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?

“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 858111007889.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Look the product up yourself in NSF’s certified-products registry.

Search “Toniiq, LLC” at info.nsf.org — certification covers contents and contaminants, not effectiveness.

4

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.