Barcode confirmed in an outside database
UPCitemdb resolves 860002071732 to "Organic Turmeric Root Powder | 16 oz (1 lbs) | Lab Tested for Heavy Metal and Pu" () — consistent with this listing.
Full record · 860002071732 · back to the summary
OSR - Organic Turmeric Powder with Curcumin | 16oz or 454g | USDA Organic and Non-GMO | …
Exact product checkedGTIN 00860002071732 · checked 2026-08-02
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
16listed rows
16separately quantified
0combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 16 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 | — | |
| Calories from Fat | 6 | — | |
| Total Fat | 1 g | — | |
| Saturated Fat | 0 g | — | |
| Trans Fat | 0 g | — | |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg | — | |
| Sodium | 3 mg | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 5 g | — | |
| Dietary Fiber | 1 g | — | |
| Sugar | 0 g | — | |
| Protein | 1 g | — | |
| Vitamin A | 0 % | — | |
| Calcium | 1 % | — | |
| Vitamin C | 3 % | — | |
| Iron | 16 % | — | |
| Potassium | 16 % | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out2
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Documented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing8
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 3 actives sum to 0 mg, which fits inside the ≈7,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
65 servings × 7 g = 455 g, matching the printed net weight 453 g (NET WEIGHT 16 oz (453g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 184 on 2025-06-30 to 274 on 2026-07-19 (net +90). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Brand ownership record not saved
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 860002071732.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “…DIETARY SUPPLEMENT SUPPORT: This turmeric powder can be incorporated into your daily wellness routine as a natural dietary supplement…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Dietary Fiber | shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label | 1 g — below the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 860002071732 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Organic Spice Resource |
| Source listing identifier | B08HYBN4DJ |
| Retailer listing title | OSR - Organic Turmeric Powder with Curcumin | 16oz or 454g | USDA Orga… show full titleOSR - Organic Turmeric Powder with Curcumin | 16oz or 454g | USDA Organic and Non-GMO | 100% Raw and Natural |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 tbsp (7g) |
| Servings per container | 65 |
| Net weight | NET WEIGHT 16 oz (453g) |
| Badges printed on pack | Non-GMO Project Verified, USDA Organic, USDA ORGANIC, NON GMO Project VERIFIED, Non-GMO Project, Certified Organic, Non-GMO, RAW |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Calories from Fat | 6 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Fat | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Saturated Fat | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Trans Fat | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 3 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 5 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Dietary Fiber | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sugar | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin A | 0 % | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Calcium | 1 % | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin C | 3 % | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Iron | 16 % | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Potassium | 16 % | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Organic” · “Gluten Free” · “Raw from India” · “CERTIFIED ORGANIC AND NON GMO” · “OUR ENTIRE SUPPLY CHAIN FOLLOW RIGOR ORGANIC PROCESSES AND COMPLIANCE.” · “THIS ALLOWS US TO BRING YOU THE HIGHEST QUALITY PRODUCT THAT IS ALWAYS GROWN AND HARVESTED IN A SUSTAINABLE WAY.” · “COMMITED TO OUR CUSTOMERS- WORRY FREE PURCHASE” · “WE PROMISE YOU WILL LOVE OUR PRODUCT, IF NOT SIMPLY CONTACT OUR STAFF WITH YOUR ORDER INFORMATION AND WE WILL ISSUE YOU ”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $11.99 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Official brand domain: www.shopOSR.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin A — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,699) · UL 3000 mcg (preformed vitamin A (retinol); excludes beta-carotene)
Calcium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Iron — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)
Potassium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
prebiotic fiber (inulin-type) — NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 860002071732 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai