FDA recall appears in this brand's history
An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
Exact product checked · GTIN 860008610508Black Forest · observed 2026-07-22
The useful read · Black Forest
Black Forest NMN Supplements 1,000 mg (Nicotinamide…
FDA recall appears in this brand's history
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
60capsules · 30 servings
The headline amount is not tied to a same-name panel row
You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
Every declared ingredient has an amount · 2 quantified rows.
You can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.
Shopper scorecard
The useful findings, in decision order.
Only product facts and comparisons earn a card. Pipeline gaps stay collapsed.
Is the label honest?
Public contextListing claim vs Supplement Facts
The headline amount is not tied to a same-name panel row
The listing presents 1,000 mg for nmn, but vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 does not contain a same-name quantified row. The retained image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
Why it mattersYou are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
Open the source-linked findingChecks outNIH / published research
Every declared ingredient has an amount · 2 quantified rows.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Why it mattersYou can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.
Open the source-linked findingAny trouble on the record?
Needs explanationFDA public records
FDA recall appears in this brand's history
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Publix Super Markets, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2024-07-30: “Potential Listeria Monocytogenes” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “Boars Head Grab and Go Wedge Ham, Smoke Mast…
Why it mattersAn exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
Open the source-linked findingWill it do what you want?
Public contextNIH / published research
Research links are available for NMN.
Published sources describe how NMN have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: nicotinamide mononucleotide human trial, ClinicalTrials.gov — NMN.
Why it mattersUse the linked research to check whether the ingredient and outcome you care about are actually connected. Ingredient evidence does not verify this product.
Open the source-linked findingWhat remains open 2
- Not yet in NIH's public label registry.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Relevant research · quick links
Read the ingredient evidence directly
These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.
What would settle the biggest open question?
Do the labeled amounts reconcile with the stated serving and container? Evidence that would settle it: identity-bound Supplement Facts panel.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out03
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nmn dose matches the amounts used in studies
label claims 1000 mg/serving — within the range commonly used in research (human trials to date mostly use 250–1,000 mg/day). Sources: PubMed search: nicotinamide mononucleotide human trial, ClinicalTrials.gov — NMN.
Testing claim names a recognized certifier
A named certifier/laboratory appears in the listing (registry cross-check pending).
Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Documented concerns
What needs caution00
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing08
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math
The retained listing evidence does not establish net weight, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
The headline amount is not tied to a same-name panel row
The listing presents 1,000 mg for nmn, but vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 does not contain a same-name quantified row. The retained image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how NMN have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: nicotinamide mononucleotide human trial, ClinicalTrials.gov — NMN.
FDA recall appears in this brand's history
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Publix Super Markets, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2024-07-30: “Potential Listeria Monocytogenes” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “Boars Head Grab and Go Wedge Ham, Smoke Master Black Forest Ham, Grab and Go Sandwich, NET WT. 7.5 OZ (213 g), Plastic Container, KEEP REFRIGERATED” — not necessarily the product on this page. Verify at FDA’s recall database.
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 27 on 2026-01-28 to 64 on 2026-07-14 (net +37). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
3
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
4
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 860008610508.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.