LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 00860008830296PowderVitamin · checked Aug 12, 2026 · on sale since Jun 17, 2023🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · PowderVitamin, LLC · Florida, USA
Quick read · PowderVitamin

PowderVitamin Electrolytes Powder Plus

Checked against public sources on August 12, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

100servings per container

Does the marketing hold up?

Every ingredient shows its amount · 20 ingredients listed. Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.

Is the dose real?Listing and panel agreeboth say 120 mg of Calcium
What a serving costs$0.37per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸PowderVitamin, LLClimited liability company · Florida, USA
Is it the real thing?Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?No recalls found

“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.

1? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 1 Scoop (5.3g) · 100 servings per container · NET WEIGHT 550g

Calories0
Total Fat0 g
Saturated Fat0 g
Trans Fat0 g
Cholesterol0 mg
Sodium (Organic Himalayan Salt)120 mg
Total Carbohydrate0 g
Dietary Fiber0 g
Total Sugars0 g
Includes Added Sugars0 g
Protein0 g
Vitamin D0 mcg
Calcium (Calcium Citrate)120 mg
Iron0 mg
Potassium (Potassium Citrate)1000 mg
Vitamin C (PurC® Organic Acerola)25 mg
Magnesium (Magnesium Citrate)120 mg
Zinc (Zinc Citrate)1 mg
Manganese (Manganese Citrate)0.2 mg
Chloride (Organic Himalayan Salt)180 mg

Printed on the package: KETO friendly · MADE IN USA · NON GMO · PLANT BASED · GLUTEN FREE · Non-GMO · GMO FREE · SOY FREE

We read 20 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Marketing claims, checked

The checks, one by one

The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.

?Couldn’t verify independently1

“IN”

“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.

Evidence →

We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.

Quick read · 1 useful finding

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

CheckedIs the label honest?

Every ingredient shows its amount · 20 ingredients listed.

Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 3
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
  • We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
  • Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
PowderVitamin, LLCLimited Liability Company · exact supplement-class mark for POWDERVITAMIN
AssignmentsNo transfers recorded

Filed address
390 N Orange Ave, Suite 2300, 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 1500, Orlando, Virginia 32801, UNITED STATES

USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.

Background reading

What the research says about these amounts

Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.

The panel lists 120 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits below that range.

0studied 200 mg–420 mg

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

The panel lists 1 mg of zinc per serving. Studies we found used 8 mg–40 mg a day, so this sits below that range.

0studied 8 mg–40 mg

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

Amazon

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$36.99

$0.37 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 12, 2026

View on Amazon ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Walmart ↗

Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want the complete evidence trail?

The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built August 12, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.