LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 00860009326446Rho Nutrition · checked Sep 2, 2026 · on sale since Jan 6, 2024
Quick read · Rho Nutrition

Rho Nutrition Liposomal NAD+ Liquid Supplement

Checked against public sources between July 25 and September 2, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

Does the marketing hold up?

Testing claimed — documentation not found. The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. …

Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified1 ingredient listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$1.67per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?Claimed — no lab or certificate found
Who’s behind it?No exact match in USPTO
Is it the real thing?Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?Recall check not run yeta gap in our records, not a finding about the product

“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.

1◖ partly confirmed1△ support not found2? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size Just Under One Teaspoon (4mL) · 30 servings per container · 4 fl oz | 120 mL

NAD+ (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide)100 mg

Printed on the package: cGMP FACILITY · GMP CERTIFIED · THIRD-PARTY TESTED · NON-GMO LIPIDS · SUGAR FREE · VEGAN FRIENDLY · KETO FRIENDLY · GLUTEN FREE

We read 1 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Marketing claims, checked

The checks, one by one

1 promise needs a closer look.

Partly confirmed1

“in the USA using thoughtfully selected worldwide ingredients in a GMP-certified facility and third-party tested for purity, potency and”

“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

Evidence →

Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.

Claimed without support found1

“within 75 days of”

We found no study of this product measuring the stated outcome over the stated timeframe.

Evidence →

?Couldn’t verify independently2

“in the USA using thoughtfully selected worldwide ingredients in a GMP-certified facility and third-party tested for purity, potency and”

No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.

Evidence →
“in the USA using thoughtfully selected worldwide ingredients in a GMP-certified facility and third-party tested for purity, potency and”

“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.

Evidence →

We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.

Quick read · 3 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

CheckedIs the label honest?

Every ingredient shows its amount · 1 ingredients listed.

Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedWho is behind it?

The barcode identity checks out · 860009326446.

The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.

Evidence and sources

Open Food Facts resolves 860009326446 to "Liposomal NAD+" (rho nutrition) — consistent with this listing.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedCan you trust the review pattern?

Reviews rose from 162 to 306 between August 6, 2025 and August 28, 2026 — no sudden jump.

A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.

Evidence and sources

Written reviews rose from 162 to 306 between August 6, 2025 and August 28, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 23, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 1
  • We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

Amazon

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$49.95

$1.67 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026

View on Amazon ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Walmart ↗

Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want to inspect the evidence?

The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.