Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 860009461963 · back to the summary
WONDERCOW Hair Skin and Nails Vitamins w/Bovine Colostrum
Exact product checkedGTIN 00860009461963 · checked 2026-07-31
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
9listed rows
9separately quantified
0combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 9 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | — | |
| Protein | 1 g | — | |
| Vitamin B6 (as Pyridoxal 5-Phosphate) | 2.5 mg | — | |
| Biotin (as Biotin Dicalcium Phosphate) | 300 mcg | — | |
| Zinc (as Zinc Amino Acid Chelate) | 5 mcg | — | |
| Bovine Whole Colostrum | 1,000 mg | — | |
| Bovine Collagen Powder | 500 mg | — | |
| Hyaluronic Acid (as sodium hyaluronate) | 50 mg | — | |
| Bovine Lactoferrin | 50 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out4
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists WonderCow Inc. (CORPORATION) in CALIFORNIA, USA for the listing brand wordmark “WONDERCOW”. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product. The saved package uses a different brand name, so this owner record does not settle who owns that package branding.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 860009461963 to "Wonderglow" (Wondercow) — consistent with this listing.
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 93 to 122 between July 17, 2025 and July 11, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 6, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Package brand differs from the listing brand
The exact product listing names “WONDERCOW,” while the saved package/panel image reads “WONDERGLOW.” This can reflect a product line, catalog error, changed listing, or different packaging; it does not prove substitution. Confirm the package identity before applying ownership or other brand-level records to this product.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing7
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how collagen peptides, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 92 on 2025-06-27 to 122 on 2026-07-11 (net +30). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 860009461963.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…THIRD PARTY TESTED…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Benefit claim “WONDERCOW Hair Skin and Nails Vitamins w/Bovine Colostrum, Collagen, Hyaluronic Acid, Biotin, Zinc, & Lactoferrin┃Supports Faster Hair Growth, Stronger Nails and Glowing ” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Bovine Collagen Powder | shaded = doses used in studies (2.5 g–15 g) · bar = this label | 500 mg — below the studied range |
| Zinc (as Zinc Amino Acid Chelate) | shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label | 0.005 mg — below the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
- zinc — daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 860009461963 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | WONDERCOW |
| Source listing identifier | B0D379XS3Z |
| Retailer listing title | WONDERCOW Hair Skin and Nails Vitamins w/Bovine Colostrum, Collagen, H… show full titleWONDERCOW Hair Skin and Nails Vitamins w/Bovine Colostrum, Collagen, Hyaluronic Acid, Biotin, Zinc, & Lactoferrin┃Supports Faster Hair Growth, Stronger Nails and Glowing Skin (30 Servings, Capsule) |
| USPTO brand owner | WonderCow Inc. · CORPORATION · CALIFORNIA, USA |
| Owner filed address | 14221 Ave 14, Madera, CALIFORNIA 93637, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 3 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 90 CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | Third Party Tested, Sourced in USA, No Additives, 100% Natural, Gluten Free, Non-GMO |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B6 (as Pyridoxal 5-Phosphate) | 2.5 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Biotin (as Biotin Dicalcium Phosphate) | 300 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Zinc (as Zinc Amino Acid Chelate) | 5 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bovine Whole Colostrum | 1,000 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bovine Collagen Powder | 500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Hyaluronic Acid (as sodium hyaluronate) | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bovine Lactoferrin | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“SUPPORTS GLOWING HAIR, SKIN, & NAILS” · “Colostrum | Hyaluronic Acid | Collagen | + more” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “SOURCED IN USA” · “THIRD PARTY TESTED” · “NO ADDITIVES” · “100% NATURAL” · “DOES NOT CONTAIN: Gluten, Sweeteners, Additives, Soy, Fillers, Antibiotics, GMO ingredients, Dyes”
Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $39.99 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store wondercow.com: 30 supplement products (+12 merch items) — a single-category catalog.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin B6 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)
Biotin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,606) · no UL; high doses interfere with lab tests
Zinc — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
collagen peptides — PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.
zinc — NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 860009461963 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai