The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews fell from 2,000 to 1,787 between February 14 and July 20, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 185, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Full record · 860009782617 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes 0 separately ingredients with amounts and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Blend of Herbs | 2500 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Written reviews fell from 2,000 to 1,787 between February 14 and July 20, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 185, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Technical check only: the panel’s 1 actives sum to 2,500 mg, which fits inside the ≈2,500 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
28 servings × 2.5 g = 70 g, matching the printed net weight 70 g (Net wt. 2.24 oz/70g). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
FDA's health-fraud program lists weight-loss products among the top supplement categories found to contain undeclared drug ingredients. Category-level documented fact — not a test result for this specific product. Source: fda.gov (linked in Related research).
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1,912 on 2026-01-30 to 1,787 on 2026-07-20 (net -125). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Open Food Facts resolves 860009782617 to "" (LuliTox), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 860009782617.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “…Blend with Dandelion, Ginseng, and Ginger - Supports A Healthy Weight, Digestive Health - Vegan,…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 860009782617 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | LULUTOX |
| Source listing identifier | B0CBCRL1KF |
| Retailer listing title | LULUTOX Detox Tea - Herbal Blend with Dandelion, Ginseng, and Ginger -… show full titleLULUTOX Detox Tea - Herbal Blend with Dandelion, Ginseng, and Ginger - Supports A Healthy Weight, Digestive Health - Vegan, All Natural, Laxative-Free - Peach Flavor (28 Servings) |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 tea bag. brewed (2.5 g) |
| Servings per container | 28 |
| Net weight | Net wt. 2.24 oz/70g |
| Pack statement | 28 PYRAMID TEA BAGS |
| Badges printed on pack | BLEND OF HERBS, VEGAN, GLUTEN-FREE, DAIRY-FREE, SOY-FREE, PREMIUM BLEND |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Blend of Herbs | 2500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“PREMIUM BLEND” · “GENTLE ON STOMACH” · “HERBAL SUPPLEMENT” · “Support your healthy lifestyle and general wellness with Lulutox Energizing Tea!” · “A single cup a day helps kick-start your metabolism, boost energy levels, and fight occasional bloating!” · “Enjoy a delicious, peach flavored cup of tea.” · “To support your healthy lifestyle and weight loss goals, one cup at a time!” · “Enjoy Daily:”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $27.95 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Official brand domain: www.lulutox.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record 860009782617 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai