Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “Proprietary Blend of Herbs
The panel lists “Proprietary Blend of Herbs:” (2500 mg) as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.
Full record · 860009782617 · back to the summary
LULUTOX Detox Tea - Herbal Blend with Dandelion, Ginseng, and Ginger
Exact product checkedGTIN 00860009782617 · checked 2026-09-02
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
2listed rows
1separately quantified
1combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes 1 separately quantified row and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | — | |
| Proprietary Blend of Herbs: | 2500 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out0
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing9
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 1 actives sum to 2,500 mg, which fits inside the ≈2,500 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
28 servings × 2.5 g = 70 g, matching the printed net weight 70 g (Net wt. 2.24 oz/70g). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
This category has documented FDA fraud risk
FDA's health-fraud program lists weight-loss products among the top supplement categories found to contain undeclared drug ingredients. Category-level documented fact — not a test result for this specific product. Source: fda.gov (linked in Related research).
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 480 on 2025-07-28 to 1,837 on 2026-08-17 (net +1,357). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Barcode record is too sparse to confirm identity
Open Food Facts resolves 860009782617 to "" (LuliTox), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.
Brand ownership record not saved
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
2
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 860009782617.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “LULUTOX Detox Tea - Herbal Blend with Dandelion, Ginseng, and Ginger - Supports A Healthy Weight, Digestive Health - Vegan, All Natural, Laxative-Free - Peach Flavor (28 ” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 860009782617 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | LULUTOX |
| Source listing identifier | B0CBCRL1KF |
| Retailer listing title | LULUTOX Detox Tea - Herbal Blend with Dandelion, Ginseng, and Ginger -… show full titleLULUTOX Detox Tea - Herbal Blend with Dandelion, Ginseng, and Ginger - Supports A Healthy Weight, Digestive Health - Vegan, All Natural, Laxative-Free - Peach Flavor (28 Servings) |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 tea bag. brewed (2.5 g) |
| Servings per container | 28 |
| Net weight | Net wt. 2.24 oz/70g |
| Pack statement | 28 PYRAMID TEA BAGS |
| Badges printed on pack | BLEND OF HERBS, VEGAN, GLUTEN-FREE, DAIRY-FREE, SOY-FREE, PREMIUM BLEND, HERBAL SUPPLEMENT |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Proprietary Blend of Herbs: | 2500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“It's time to.... DETOX” · “PEACH FLAVOR WITH NATURAL FLAVORS” · “PREMIUM BLEND” · “GENTLE ON STOMACH” · “helps kick-start your metabolism” · “boost energy levels” · “fight occasional bloating!” · “delicious, peach flavored cup of tea.”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $27.95 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Official brand domain: www.lulutox.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record 860009782617 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai