Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record
Label #322293 “Multi Collagen Complex Plus” (Vital Vitamins), entered 2025-03-25, with the full Supplement Facts on file. Company on file: Distributor — Vital Vitamins, Beverly Hills, CA.
Full record · 860010750414 · back to the summary
Vital Vitamins Multi Collagen Complex Plus Biotin
Exact product checkedGTIN 00860010750414 · checked 2026-09-01
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
5listed rows
2separately quantified
3combined blend totals
The nih dsld label publishes 2 separately ingredients with amounts and 3 combined blend totals. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C | 50 mg | — | |
| Biotin | 250 mcg | — | |
| Multi Collagen Complex | 1600 mg | — | |
| DigeSEB Enzyme Blend | 50 mg | — | |
| Glowing Beauty Complex | 200 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
NIH DSLD label #322293 (public label filing for this exact product) Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out3
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists ROYAL LINKER LIMITED (limited company (ltd.); HONG KONG) (OTHER; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in HONG KONG; DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 11 to 55 between August 13, 2025 and August 4, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 14, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing6
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the NIH DSLD label (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how collagen peptides have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 10 on 2025-07-30 to 55 on 2026-08-04 (net +45). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 860010750414.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “…Comprehensive Collagen Blend: Contains type I, II, III, V, and X collagen for hair, skin, nails, and joint support.…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Multi Collagen Complex | shaded = doses used in studies (2.5 g–15 g) · bar = this label | 1.6 g — below the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD)✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Supplement Facts visible in photos — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 860010750414 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Vital Vitamins |
| Source listing identifier | B0CM9VNL6Z |
| Retailer listing title | Vital Vitamins Multi Collagen Complex Plus Biotin, Hyaluronic Acid & V… show full titleVital Vitamins Multi Collagen Complex Plus Biotin, Hyaluronic Acid & VIT. C |
| USPTO brand owner | ROYAL LINKER LIMITED (limited company (ltd.); HONG KONG) · OTHER; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · HONG KONG; DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | HONG KONG); Room 1203,12/F, Tower 3 China Hong Kong, 33 Canton Road, Tsimshatsui, Kowloon, HONG KONG |
Supplement Facts — NIH DSLD registry
serving: 3 Capsule(s) · contents: 150 Capsule(s) · label #322293 at dsld.od.nih.gov
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
| Vitamin C | 50 mg |
| Biotin | 250 mcg |
| Multi Collagen Complex | 1600 mg |
| DigeSEB Enzyme Blend | 50 mg |
| Glowing Beauty Complex | 200 mg |
mcg = 1/1,000 of a mg. As filed in the NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database — the authoritative digitization of the printed label. Label versions can lag reformulations.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $54.95 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store vitalvitamins.co: 33 supplement products (+2 merch items) — a single-category catalog.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Biotin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,606) · no UL; high doses interfere with lab tests
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
collagen peptides — PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 860010750414 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai