The dose claim fits the serving — physically possible
Claimed collagen 20,000.0 mg is 95% of the ≈21,100 mg serving (serving size printed on the packaging (photo-read from listing images)) — within physical limits.
Full record · 860013478520 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
We did the comparison: the listing claims 20 g of hydrolyzed collagen peptides (from bovine hide), and the listing-image panel shows 20 g hydrolyzed collagen peptides (from bovine hide) serving size 2 scoops (21.1 g). Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 70 | — | |
| Protein | 18 g | — | |
| Calcium | 26 mg | — | |
| Sodium | 100 mg | — | |
| Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides (from bovine hide) | 20 g | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Claimed collagen 20,000.0 mg is 95% of the ≈21,100 mg serving (serving size printed on the packaging (photo-read from listing images)) — within physical limits.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists SAMBOKS Inc. (CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in CANADA; TEXAS, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Written reviews rose from 8 to 10 between December 1, 2025 and May 21, 2026. No single 30-day window in the dated series shows a rise.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
label claims 20000 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides). Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
The listing claims 20 g; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides (from bovine hide) at 20 g per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
14 servings × 21.1 g = 295.4 g, matching the printed net weight 295.4 g (10.42 OZ NET WT (295.4 g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (2500–15000 mg), this product runs roughly $87 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
Published sources describe how collagen peptides have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 7 on 2025-09-30 to 10 on 2026-05-21 (net +3). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Answered by the panel: 20 g of the 20 g headline is collagen. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?
The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 860013478520.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…facilities, third-party tested for purity and potency, Non-GMO, vegan, and free from unnecessary fillers.…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Professional-endorsement claim “…Every BonaVit formula is doctor-formulated by Dr.…” | Marketing credential We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers | A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed. |
| Manufacturing claim “…Made in GMP-certified U.…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…A high-dose formula designed to support skin, hair, nails, joints, and the protein your body uses to recover after training.…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label claims 20000 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides). |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides (from bovine hi | shaded = doses used in studies (2.5 g–15 g) · bar = this label | 20 g — above the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 860013478520 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Bonavit |
| Source listing identifier | B0FB8VYR42 |
| Retailer listing title | Bonavit - Collagen Peptides Powder - High Dose 20g Collagen + 18g Prot… show full titleBonavit - Collagen Peptides Powder - High Dose 20g Collagen + 18g Protein - Hydrolyzed Type I & III Collagen with Probiotics & Digestive Enzymes - Dr. Formulated - BonaGlow Vanilla |
| USPTO brand owner | SAMBOKS Inc. · CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · CANADA; TEXAS, USA |
| Owner filed address | 346 Ridley Blvd., Toronto, M3H1L4, CANADA |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size 2 Scoops (21.1 g) |
| Servings per container | 14 |
| Net weight | 10.42 OZ NET WT (295.4 g) |
| Badges printed on pack | Gluten Free, Non-GMO, Paleo, Dairy & Soy Free, Non GMO |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 70 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 18 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Calcium | 26 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides (from bovine hide) | 20 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“High Dose” · “Type I & III Collagen” · “Skin, Hair, Nail, Gut and Joint Support†” · “Gluten Free, Non-GMO” · “20g Collagen Per Serving” · “Grass Fed & Pasture Raised” · “HYDROLYZED COLLAGEN” · “14 Servings”
Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $40.50 checked Aug 04, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store bonavit.com: 8 supplement products — a single-category catalog.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Calcium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
collagen peptides — PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies
ℹ Dosage: label claims 20000 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides).
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 860013478520 · built August 04, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai