The dose claim fits the serving — physically possible
Claimed collagen 22,000.0 mg is 99% of the ≈22,200 mg serving (serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 874659002544) — within physical limits.
Full record · 874659002544 · back to the summary
Grass-Fed Collagen Peptides Powder - Unflavored Collagen Powder for Women & Men
Exact product checkedGTIN 00874659002544 · checked 2026-07-26
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The 22 g grass-fed bovine collagen hydrolysate claim matches the panel
MARKETING22 g — per-serving claim
PANELGrass-Fed Bovine Collagen Hydrolysate 22.2 g — same amountGrass-Fed Bovine Collagen Hydrolysate 22.2 g
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 22 g of grass-fed bovine collagen hydrolysate, and the listing-image panel shows 22.2 g grass-fed bovine collagen hydrolysate 1 scoop (22.2g). Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 | — | |
| Protein | 20g | — | |
| Sodium | 100 mg | — | |
| Grass-Fed Bovine Collagen Hydrolysate | 22.2g | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out5
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Transparent Labs, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CORPORATION) in UTAH, USA; CANADA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Testing claim names a recognized certifier
A named certifier/laboratory appears in the listing (registry cross-check pending).
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 874659002544 to "Grass-Fed Collagen" (Transparent Labs) — consistent with this listing.
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 2 to 19 between April 8 and July 14, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 6, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Dose is higher than studies used
label claims 22000 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides). Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing8
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listing claim matches the label panel
The listing claims 22 g; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Grass-Fed Bovine Collagen Hydrolysate at 22.2 g per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
30 servings × 22.2 g = 666 g, matching the printed net weight 666 g (NET WT. 666G (1.47 LBS)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Cost to reach a studied dose
At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (2500–15000 mg), this product runs roughly $50 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how collagen peptides have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-03-25 to 19 on 2026-07-14 (net +19). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Answered by the panel: 22.2 g of the 22 g headline is collagen. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?
The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.
2
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
3
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 874659002544.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…Third-Party Tested for Purity & Potency: Transparent Labs is Informed Choice certified; we are dedicated to clean, premium ingredients with transparent formulas.…” | Partly supported We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | A testing body is named on the listing, but we found no lot-specific certificate of analysis. |
| Manufacturing claim “…Our Collagen is manufactured in FDA-registered facilities, following strict GMP guidelines, and undergoes third-party testing to ensure purity, potency, and safety.…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…Supports Skin, Joints, Hair & Nails: Collagen is the most abundant protein in the human body and plays a critical role in skin hydration and elasticity, joint and connec” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label claims 22000 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides). |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Grass-Fed Bovine Collagen Hydrolysate | shaded = doses used in studies (2.5 g–15 g) · bar = this label | 22.2 g — above the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 5 of 6 public signals
✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found✓ Third-party lab named or registry-certified· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 874659002544 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Transparent Labs |
| Source listing identifier | B0FMQ4FYLY |
| Retailer listing title | Grass-Fed Collagen Peptides Powder - Unflavored Collagen Powder for Wo… show full titleGrass-Fed Collagen Peptides Powder - Unflavored Collagen Powder for Women & Men, 22G Grassfed Bovine Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides per Serving for Skin, Hair, Bones & Muscle Recovery - 30 Servings |
| USPTO brand owner | Transparent Labs, LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CORPORATION · UTAH, USA; CANADA |
| Owner filed address | 3 Abarrota Rancho, Mission Viejo, CALIFORNIA 92694, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 Scoop (22.2g) |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Net weight | NET WT. 666G (1.47 LBS) |
| Badges printed on pack | INFORMED PROTEIN, INFORMED CHOICE, Gluten Free |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 20g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Grass-Fed Bovine Collagen Hydrolysate | 22.2g | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“GRASS-FED COLLAGEN” · “No Artifical Dyes, Flavors or Sweeteners” · “Gluten Free” · “No Artificial Dyes, Flavors or Sweeteners” · “No Artificial Sweeteners” · “No Artificial Colors or Fillers” · “Clinically-Dosed Formulas” · “No Artificial Preservatives”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $49.99 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store transparentlabs.com: 64 supplement products (+6 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Related research & consistency
collagen peptides — PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies
ℹ Dosage: label claims 22000 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides).
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 874659002544 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai