Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 879452000964 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
We did the comparison: the listing claims 30 mg of zinc (as zinc bisglycinate chelate), and the listing-image panel shows 30 mg zinc (as zinc bisglycinate chelate) 1 capsule. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin (Vitamin B-2) | 2.8 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 5.2 mg | — | |
| Zinc (as Zinc Bisglycinate Chelate) | 30 mg | — | |
| Molybdenum | 50 mcg | — | |
| Malic Acid | 200 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists Designs for Health, Inc. (CORPORATION) in CONNECTICUT, USA; DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
UPCitemdb resolves 879452000964 to "Designs for Health - Zinc Supreme 90 vegetarian capsules [Health and Beauty]" (Designs for Health) — consistent with this listing.
Written reviews rose from 113 to 140 between August 2, 2025 and August 28, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 6, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.
Designs for Health appears in NSF’s certified-products registry with 10 certified product(s), but we couldn’t confirm this exact listing is among them. Closest listed product: “Zinc +”. Certification covers contents and contaminants — not effectiveness.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 112 on 2025-07-25 to 140 on 2026-08-28 (net +28). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 879452000964.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Look the product up yourself in NSF’s certified-products registry.
Search “Designs for Health” at info.nsf.org — certification covers contents and contaminants, not effectiveness.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Professional-endorsement claim “…#1 RECOMMENDED PRACTITIONER SUPPLEMENT B…” | Marketing credential We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers | A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed. |
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP CERTIFIED…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “Designs for Health Zinc Supreme - 30mg Zinc Bisglycinate Chelate Supplement, Vitamin B6, B2 + Molybdenum - Immune Support Supplement - Vegan + Non-GMO (90 Capsules)…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Zinc (as Zinc Bisglycinate Chelate) | shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label | 30 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 879452000964 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Designs for Health |
| Source listing identifier | B000FH125U |
| Retailer listing title | Designs for Health Zinc Supreme - 30mg Zinc Bisglycinate Chelate Suppl… show full titleDesigns for Health Zinc Supreme - 30mg Zinc Bisglycinate Chelate Supplement, Vitamin B6, B2 + Molybdenum - Immune Support Supplement - Vegan + Non-GMO (90 Capsules) |
| USPTO brand owner | Designs for Health, Inc. · CORPORATION · CONNECTICUT, USA; DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | 2 North Road, East Windsor, CONNECTICUT 06088, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 capsule |
| Pack statement | 90 Vegetarian Capsules |
| Badges printed on pack | FOUNDATIONAL HEALTH Professional Use Onl, FOUNDATIONAL HEALTH, Professional Use Only, GMP CERTIFIED, NSF, #1 RECOMMENDED PRACTITIONER SUPPLEMENT B, TRAACS®, GMP, GMP-certified |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin (Vitamin B-2) | 2.8 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B-6 | 5.2 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Zinc (as Zinc Bisglycinate Chelate) | 30 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Molybdenum | 50 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Malic Acid | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“30 mg zinc and vitamin B2, B6” · “Bioavailable” · “Immune†” · “Skin†” · “Combined with additional nutrients to provide superior results*” · “Powerful immune support nutrient*” · “Supports healthy skin, metabolism, reproductive health, and the nervous system*” · “Optimized, Synergistic Formula”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Official brand domain: www.designsforhealth.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Riboflavin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (3,172) · no UL established
Zinc — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)
Molybdenum — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (809) · UL 2000 mcg (adults)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
zinc — NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 879452000964 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai