Checked against public sources on August 1, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “Natural Herbal Sleep Blend”. The panel lists “Natural Herbal Sleep Blend” (300 mg) as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Calories | 12 |
|---|---|
| Total Carbohydrate | 3 g |
| Total Sugar | 0 g |
| Includes 0g Added Sugar | 0 g |
| Vitamin B6 (as Pyridoxal-5-Phosphate) | 10 mg |
| Vitamin B12 (as Methylcobalamin) | 500 mcg |
| Vitamin D3 (from Lichen) | 50 mcg(2000IU) |
| Magnesium (as Magnesium Glycinate) | 400 mg |
| GABA (as Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid) | 250 mg |
| Ashwagandha Root Extract (Withania Somnifera)(Standardized to 10% Withanolide) | 500 mg |
| L-Theanine | 200 mg |
| Rhodiola Rosea Extract (Rhodiola Rosea)(Standardized to 3% Rosavins and 1% Salidroside) | 100 mg |
| Saffron Extract (Crocus sativus)(Standardized to 2% safranal) | 100 mg |
| Key Lime Peel Extract (10:1 Extract)(Citrus aurantifolia)(Peel) | 100 mg |
| Natural Herbal Sleep Blend | 300 mg |
We read 15 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 400 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
The panel lists 500 mg of ashwagandha per serving. Studies we found used 250 mg–600 mg a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
$1.25 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 2, 2026
View on Amazon ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built August 02, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.