lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 880681252000 · back to the summary

Rugby Daily-Vite Multivitamin for Adults, 100 Tablets (2-Pack)

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built August 02, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00880681252000 · checked 2026-07-30

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

9listed rows
9separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 9 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Vitamin A (as acetate)1500 mcg
Vitamin C (as ascorbic acid)60 mg
Vitamin D (as cholecalciferol)10 mcg (400 IU)
Thiamin (as thiamine HCl)1.5 mg
Riboflavin1.7 mg
Niacin20 mg
Vitamin B6 (as pyridoxine HCl)2 mg
Folate680 mcg DFE (400 mcg Folic Acid)
Vitamin B12 (as cyanocobalamin)6 mcg

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out1

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing7

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 59 on 2025-09-28 to 84 on 2026-07-25 (net +25). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Brand ownership record not saved

This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 880681252000.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID880681252000 — via source listing UPC
BrandRUGBY LABORATORIES
Source listing identifierB00KJ2DLEG

From the label (photo-read)

Serving sizeServing Size 1 Tablet
Pack statement100 tablets
Badges printed on packGluten Free

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Vitamin A (as acetate)1500 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C (as ascorbic acid)60 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin D (as cholecalciferol)10 mcg (400 IU)High
clearly legible in the photo
Thiamin (as thiamine HCl)1.5 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Riboflavin1.7 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Niacin20 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B6 (as pyridoxine HCl)2 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Folate680 mcg DFE (400 mcg Folic Acid)High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B12 (as cyanocobalamin)6 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“vitamin supplement” · “60 years strong” · “A LEGACY of delivering quality OTC & vitamin supplements” · “NEW LOOK” · “SAME GREAT PRODUCT” · “Packaging may vary” · “DAILY VITAMIN SUPPLEMENT” · “Take one tablet daily, preferably with a meal”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$8.99 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science

No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin ANIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,699) · UL 3000 mcg (preformed vitamin A (retinol); excludes beta-carotene)

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

ThiaminNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,262) · no UL established

RiboflavinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (3,172) · no UL established

NiacinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)

Vitamin B6NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)

FolateNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,628) · UL 1000 mcg (synthetic folic acid from supplements/fortified food)

Vitamin B12NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Record 880681252000 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai