Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$18.99
$0.08 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 31, 2026
View on Amazon ↗
Exact product checked · GTIN 00888107117186U.S. Wellness Naturals · checked Jul 31, 2026 · on sale since Mar 2, 2025Package says distributed by: U.S. Wellness LLC · P.O. Box 94011 Cleveland, Ohio, 44101
Quick read · U.S. Wellness Naturals
U.S. Wellness Naturals Organic Ashwagandha Root Powder
Checked against public sources on July 31, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Research links are available for prebiotic fiber. Use the linked research to check whether the ingredient and outcome you care about are actually connected. Ingredient evidence does not verify this product.
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified15 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$0.08per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?No exact match in USPTO
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?✓No recalls found
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Calories | 5 |
|---|---|
| Total Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated Fat | 0 g |
| Trans Fat | 0 g |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg |
| Sodium | 0 mg |
| Total Carbohydrate | 1 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 1 g |
| Total Sugars | 0 g |
| Includes Added Sugars | 0 g |
| Protein | less than 1 g |
| Vitamin D | 0 mcg |
| Calcium | 0 mg |
| Iron | 0 mg |
| Potassium | 0 mg |
Printed on the package: USDA ORGANIC · OEFFA · Certified Organic by OEFFA
We read 15 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Quick read · 0 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
What remains open 5
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
- No dated review-history series is on file yet.
- Brand ownership is not settled in this record.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Background reading
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 1 g of prebiotic fiber (inulin-type) per serving. Studies we found used 3 g–10 g a day, so this sits below that range.
0studied 3 g–10 g
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
iHerb
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built August 02, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.