full reportFull record · 898152001644 · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 9 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories (energy) | 35 | — | |
| Total Fat | 3.5 g | — | |
| Cholesterol | 20 mg | — | |
| Protein | <1 g | — | |
| Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) | 25 mcg | — | |
| Total Omega-3 Fatty Acids** | 2400 mg | — | |
| EPA as rTG** | 1680 mg | — | |
| DHA as rTG** | 560 mg | — | |
| Additional Omega-3 Fatty Acids** | 160 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
USPTO lists PRN Physician Recommended Nutriceuticals, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The panel lists 2,240 mg EPA + DHA per serving (3 Softgels). One randomized dose-response trial used 300–1,800 mg/day; omega-3 studies vary widely. This is research context, not a recommendation or safety verdict.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how omega-3 have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Omega-3 Fatty Acids fact sheet, PubMed dose-response trial.
PRN Physician Recommended Nutriceuticals LLC appears in NSF’s certified-products registry with 10 certified product(s), but we couldn’t confirm this exact listing is among them. Closest listed product: “EyePromise® EZ Tears™, Dry Eye Formula”. Certification covers contents and contaminants — not effectiveness.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 104 on 2025-07-03 to 212 on 2026-07-23 (net +108). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 898152001644.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Look the product up yourself in NSF’s certified-products registry.
Search “PRN Physician Recommended Nutriceuticals” at info.nsf.org — certification covers contents and contaminants, not effectiveness.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Professional-endorsement claim “…PHYSICIAN RECOMMENDED NUTRICEUTICALS…” | Marketing credential We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers | A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed. |
| Manufacturing claim “…Consistency is key: Take 3 softgels daily with a meal to support healthy, hydrated eyes without a fishy aftertaste; this NSF Contents Certified supplement manufactured a” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…Patented 3:1 ratio: Our omega 3 supplement is formulated with a 3:1 EPA to DHA ratio, clinically backed to support eye health and tear production; our ultra-purified re-” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Total Omega-3 Fatty Acids** | shaded = doses used in studies (300 mg–1.8 g) · bar = this label | 2.4 g — above the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 898152001644 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | PRN Physician Recommended Nutriceuticals |
| Source listing identifier | B081VPBXR5 |
| Retailer listing title | De3 Occasional Eye Dryness rTG Omega 3 Supplement, 90 Count, 30-Day Su… show full titleDe3 Occasional Eye Dryness rTG Omega 3 Supplement, 90 Count, 30-Day Supply |
| USPTO brand owner | PRN Physician Recommended Nutriceuticals, LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | 960 Harvest Drive, Suite B205, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania 19422, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 3 Softgels |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 90 SOFTGELS |
| Badges printed on pack | GMP, NSF, cGMP |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories (energy) | 35 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Fat | 3.5 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Cholesterol | 20 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | <1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) | 25 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Omega-3 Fatty Acids** | 2400 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| EPA as rTG** | 1680 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| DHA as rTG** | 560 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Additional Omega-3 Fatty Acids** | 160 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“3 SOFTGELS A DAY” · “2400 mg rTG Omega-3 with Vitamin D” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “PHYSICIAN RECOMMENDED NUTRICEUTICALS” · “Soothe, restore & protect” · “Soothes feelings of discomfort, including grittiness & burning” · “Restores moisture to the eye by supporting healthy tear production” · “Protects and retains moisture by supporting a healthy tear film”
Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $67.75 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin D — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)
Omega-3 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (14,320) · FDA: <5 g/day EPA+DHA from supplements
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
omega-3 (EPA + DHA) — NIH ODS — Omega-3 Fatty Acids fact sheet · PubMed dose-response trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 684 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: research measures EPA and DHA together, not the weight of the fish-oil concentrate; the panel must expose those rows separately.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 898152001644 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai