Exact product checked · GTIN 00898440001066Qunol · checked Jul 21, 2026 · on sale since Apr 30, 2017USPTO returned 2 exact supplement-class owner records · inspect the identity trail
Quick read · Qunol
Qunol Mega Ubiquinol CoQ10, 100 mg
Checked against public sources between July 21 and July 24, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
100softgels
100servings per container
Does the marketing hold up?
The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient. You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified3 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$0.33per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?USPTO lists 2 owner recordssame brand name, more than one registrant — we don’t choose between them
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?✓No recalls found
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
Serving size 1 Softgel · 100 servings per container
Calories
6
Vitamin C (as ascorbyl palmitate)
6 mg
Ubiquinol (Kaneka Ubiquinol®1) active form of Coenzyme Q10
100 mg
Printed on the package:DIETARY SUPPLEMENT · Gluten Free
We read 3 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Quick read · 4 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Public contextIs the label honest?
The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient
You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
Evidence and sources
The listing presents 100 mg for coq10, but vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Quten Research Institute, LLC, Quten IP Holdings, LLC. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
The brand has 2 exact supplement-class records
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
🇺🇸Quten Research Institute, LLC
Delaware, USA · Registration 7724060
10 Bloomfield Ave., Building B, Pine Brook, New Jersey 07058, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Nutritional supplements.
🇺🇸Quten IP Holdings, LLC
NEVADA, USA; DELAWARE, USA · Registration 4690885
39 Plymouth Street, Fairfield, NEW JERSEY 07004, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary supplements.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
Same UPC/GTIN observed across 3 sellers. Brand website was lowest at $32.99; iHerb was highest at $36.00 — a $3.01 range at check time.
The observed listing and exact brand page repeat 100 mg, 100 count. That confirms cross-page consistency of the published claim, not the product contents.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.
