LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
What remains open · The Ordinary

The Ordinary Hyaluronic Acid 2% + B5 (with Ceramides)

USPTO shows 2 supplement-class owner records: Deciem Beauty Group Inc. and Shiji Chuangmei (Xiamen) Brand Management Co., Ltd.  (limited company (ltd.); CHINA).

Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

What this means for you · What remains open

What the public record can establish

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Deciem Beauty Group Inc., Shiji Chuangmei (Xiamen) Brand Management Co., Ltd. (limited company (ltd.); CHINA). These records a…

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

3declared rows
3separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 3 declared rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Hyaluronic Acid2%
B5
Niacinamide10%
Zinc1%

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Public ownership records

The brand has 2 exact supplement-class records

These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.

🇨🇦Deciem Beauty Group Inc.

CANADA · Registration 8172998

15 Fraser Avenue, Toronto ON M6K 1Y7, CANADA

Goods covered by this record

IC 005: Acne medication; acne treatment preparations; medicated creams for treating for the treatment of acne; medicated face creams and cleansers for the treatment of acne; medicinal preparation for skin care; medicinal creams for skin care; preparations for cleansing the skin for medical use; medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels and cleaners..

🇨🇳Shiji Chuangmei (Xiamen) Brand Management Co., Ltd.  (limited company (ltd.); CHINA)

CHINA · Registration 6924610

CHINA); Room 803 No.1 Wenping Yili,Siming Dist., Xiamen, 361000, CHINA

Goods covered by this record

IC 001: Phosphine; Phosphoprotein; Phosphorus; Acetylene for industrial purposes; Catalysts for use in the oil processing industry; Metal oxide powders for industrial purposes; Microbes for use in the manufacture of probiotic supplements; Nitrous oxide for industrial use; Nucleotides for scientific and research use; Phosphoric acid; Phosphoric anhydride; Phosphorus chloride; Phosphorus sulphide; Powdered carbon for secondary cell batteries; Reagents for scientific and research use; Silver chloride; Silver cyanide; Silver iodide; Silver nitrate; Size for use in the textile industry.

This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product.

Review history
/ 5
not shownvisible ratings

Review counts rose gradually. Written-review counts rose from 3,367 to 4,424 across the observed period. That describes count movement, not review authenticity or product quality. A variation family may share some public counts.

Keepa exact-listing history · counts do not prove authenticity · variation family may share counts

Relevant research · quick links

Read the ingredient evidence directly

These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.

What would settle the biggest open question?

Which exact USPTO registrant is tied to this product's brand use? Evidence that would settle it: exact-wordmark ownership record.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out00

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.

Documented concerns

What needs caution00

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing05

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Deciem Beauty Group Inc., Shiji Chuangmei (Xiamen) Brand Management Co., Ltd.  (limited company (ltd.); CHINA). These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.

No data

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 3,367 on 2026-01-25 to 4,424 on 2026-07-09 (net +1,057). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.