Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Truong, Shirley (INDIVIDUAL) in USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full record · lc-0396d1fe · back to the summary
Ashwagandha Gummies Supplements 2000mg for Women Men
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-07-26
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
10listed rows
10separately quantified
0combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 10 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D3 | 2500iu | — | |
| Vitamin B12 (as Methylcobalamin) | 1000mcg | — | |
| Ashwagandha Root Extract (Withania Somnifera) | 2000mg | — | |
| Turmeric (95% Curcuminoids) | 100mg | — | |
| Maca Root (Lepidium Meyeni) | 50mg | — | |
| L-Theanine (From Green Tea) | 50mg | — | |
| Chamomile (Matricaria Recutita) | 50mg | — | |
| GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid) | 20mg | — | |
| Sage (Salvia Officinalis) | 20mg | — | |
| Black Pepper Extract (95% Piperine) | 10mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out1
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Documented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing4
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Review-count history: not available
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how turmeric / curcumin, ashwagandha, maca root have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Turmeric, PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing claim “…R FREE Mixed Berry Flavor DIETARY SUPPLEMENT GMP Certified Vegan Made by vitamin experts High…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Turmeric (95% Curcuminoids) | shaded = doses used in studies (500 mg–2 g) · bar = this label | 100 mg — below the studied range |
| Ashwagandha Root Extract (Withania Somnifera | shaded = doses used in studies (250 mg–600 mg) · bar = this label | 2 g — above the studied range |
| Maca Root (Lepidium Meyeni) | shaded = doses used in studies (1.5 g–3 g) · bar = this label | 50 mg — below the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-0396d1fe (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | LILICARE |
| Source listing identifier | B094D383WY |
| Retailer listing title | Ashwagandha Gummies Supplements 2000mg for Women Men - Vegan, Sugar Fr… show full titleAshwagandha Gummies Supplements 2000mg for Women Men - Vegan, Sugar Free |
| USPTO brand owner | Truong, Shirley · INDIVIDUAL · USA |
| Owner filed address | 3114 Capa Drive, Hacienda Heights, CALIFORNIA 91762, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 gummies |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 60 COUNT |
| Badges printed on pack | Vegan |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D3 | 2500iu | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B12 (as Methylcobalamin) | 1000mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Ashwagandha Root Extract (Withania Somnifera) | 2000mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Turmeric (95% Curcuminoids) | 100mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Maca Root (Lepidium Meyeni) | 50mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| L-Theanine (From Green Tea) | 50mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Chamomile (Matricaria Recutita) | 50mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid) | 20mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sage (Salvia Officinalis) | 20mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Black Pepper Extract (95% Piperine) | 10mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“SUGAR FREE” · “Mixed Berry Flavor” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “GMP Certified” · “Vegan” · “Made by vitamin experts” · “Highest quality ingredients” · “GMP certiiied facility”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin D — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Ashwagandha — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (204) · botanical; liver-injury case reports exist
Turmeric — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,288) · botanical; rare hepatotoxicity reports
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
turmeric / curcumin — NIH NCCIH — Turmeric · PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine · WebMD: turmeric · ClinicalTrials.gov — 286 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: plain curcumin absorbs poorly — most positive trials pair it with piperine (black pepper) or a bioavailability-enhanced form.
ashwagandha — NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha · PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial · WebMD: ashwagandha · ClinicalTrials.gov — 78 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract).
maca root — PubMed search: Lepidium meyenii randomized trial · NIH NCCIH — Maca · ClinicalTrials.gov — 9 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: studied for libido-related endpoints; research generally does not show testosterone changes — the two are often conflated in marketing.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record lc-0396d1fe · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai