.facts-panel-block{margin:34px 0;padding:26px 28px;border:1px solid var(--rule,#e5e0d8);border-radius:14px;background:#fff} .facts-panel-block h2{font:400 27px/1.2 var(--serif);margin:6px 0 4px} .facts-panel-block .panel-meta{margin:0 0 14px;font-size:14px;color:#6b6357} table.facts-panel{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:15px} table.facts-panel th{text-align:left;font-weight:500;padding:7px 0;border-bottom:1px solid #efeae2} table.facts-panel td{text-align:right;font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums;padding:7px 0;border-bottom:1px solid #efeae2;white-space:nowrap} table.facts-panel tr:last-child th,table.facts-panel tr:last-child td{border-bottom:0} .panel-seals{margin:14px 0 0;font-size:14px;color:#3d3830} .panel-seals span{color:#6b6357} .panel-note{margin:12px 0 0;font-size:13px;line-height:1.5;color:#6b6357} .panel-note.partial{color:#8a5a1b;background:#fdf4e6;border-left:3px solid #d99a3d;padding:9px 12px;border-radius:0 6px 6px 0} @media(max-width:640px){.facts-panel-block{padding:20px 18px}table.facts-panel{font-size:14px}}
LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedNordic Naturals · checked Jul 26, 2026 · on sale since Mar 16, 2017🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · Nordic Naturals, Inc. · CALIFORNIA, USAPackage says manufactured by: Nordic Naturals Mfg, Inc. · 111 Jennings Drive, Watsonville, CA 95076
Quick read · Nordic Naturals

Nordic Naturals Ultimate Omega 2X

Checked against public sources on July 26, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

60units
60servings per container

Does the marketing hold up?

FDA recall appears in this brand's history. An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.

Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified3 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costsNo price found for this exact barcode
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸Nordic Naturals, Inc.corporation · CALIFORNIA, USA
Is it the real thing?No barcode publishedso it can’t be matched against certification, recall or other retailer records
Trouble on record?Brand history — not this product

“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.

1◖ partly confirmedno contradictions · brand-level recall on file
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 2 Soft Gels · 60 servings per container

Total Omega-3s2150 mg
EPA (Eicosapentaenoic Acid)1125 mg
DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid)875 mg

Printed on the package: #1 FISH OIL BRAND IN THE USA · 3RD PARTY PURITY TESTED · NON-GMO TESTED · CERTIFIED SUSTAINABLE

We read 3 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Marketing claims, checked

The checks, one by one

The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.

Partly confirmed1

“OMEGA-3S - Research shows that the essential fatty acids EPA & DHA in fish oil support heart, brain, eye & immune”

The panel lists 2,000 mg EPA + DHA per serving (2 Soft Gels). One randomized dose-response trial used 300–1,800 mg/day; omega-3 studies vary widely. This is research context, not a recommendation or safety verdict.

Evidence →

Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.

Marketing language, not scored

high-strength omega-3s for heart, brain, and immune health · Extra-Strength Omega-3 Support · high-strength omega-3s for heart, brain, & immune health* · SUPERIOR ABSORPTION

Quick read · 3 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Needs explanationAny trouble in public records?

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.

Evidence and sources

This recall is not about the product on this page. Nordic Naturals, Inc. recalled a different product on May 2, 2025. FDA has since closed that case. The recalled item was “Nordic Naturals Zero Sugar Kids Multivitamin Supplement - Gummies (120 gummies/bottle); 12 bottles/case”. …

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Public contextIs the label honest?

The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient

You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.

Evidence and sources

The listing presents 2,150 mg for fish oil, but vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedIs the label honest?

Every ingredient shows its amount · 3 ingredients listed.

Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
Nordic Naturals, Inc.Corporation · exact supplement-class mark for NORDIC NATURALS
Registration3688252
Registered2009-09-29
AssignmentsNo transfers recorded

Filed address
111 Jennings Drive, Watsonville, California 95076, UNITED STATES

USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

The label amount is shown beside the range used in the linked ingredient studies.

Dose vs research

EPA + DHA

2000 mg per serving — above the 300–1800 mg/day used in the linked studies.

Linked ingredient research · label amount, not a recommendation
Background reading

What the research says about these amounts

Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.

The panel lists 1.125 g of omega-3 (EPA + DHA) per serving. Studies we found used 300 mg–1.8 g a day, so this sits inside that range.

0studied 300 mg–1.8 g

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

Buying options

Where you can check or buy it

Only the submitted seller page is identity-certain. Other destinations are shown as leads until a shared UPC/GTIN confirms the exact product.

Amazon

Submitted listing
$76.00

Lowest New observed via Keepa on 2026-07-26.

View on Amazon ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No price confirmed

No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No price confirmed

No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No price confirmed

No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.

Search Walmart ↗

Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.

Want to inspect the evidence?

The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built July 26, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.