“with doctors for comprehensive, gut health support that goes beyond”
Evidence →Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedPhysician's CHOICE · checked Aug 13, 2026 · on sale since Aug 11, 2026USPTO returned 3 exact supplement-class owner records · inspect the identity trail
Quick read · Physician's CHOICE
Physician's CHOICE 60 Billion Probiotic Advanced 3-in-1 30ct…
Checked against public sources on August 13, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
30capsules
30servings per container
Does the marketing hold up?
1 ingredient’ amounts are hidden inside “Probiotic Blend”. The label gives one combined figure of 200 mg for Total Probiotic Activity, and no amount for any of them individually. You cannot tell whether any one reaches a dose used in research — it could be almost all…
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified4 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costsNo price found for this exact barcode
Is it tested?Claimed — no lab or certificate found
Who’s behind it?USPTO lists 3 owner recordssame brand name, more than one registrant — we don’t choose between them
Is it the real thing?No barcode publishedso it can’t be matched against certification, recall or other retailer records
Trouble on record?✓No recalls found
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
1◖ partly confirmed1? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Probiotic Blend | 200 mg |
|---|---|
| Total Probiotic Activity | 60 Billion CFUs |
| Prebiotic Blend | 150 mg |
| Heat-Treated Lactobacillus gasseri CP2305 | 20 mg |
Printed on the package: NON GMO PROJECT VERIFIED · SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER · Non-GMO Project Verified · Developed with Doctors
We read 4 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed1
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
?Couldn’t verify independently1
“QUALITY - Physician's Choice 60 Billion Probiotic Advanced is Non-GMO Project Verified and 3rd-party tested for safety, purity, and”
Evidence →No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Marketing language, not scored
ADVANCED PRE + PRO + POSTBIOTIC · AN ADVANCED APPROACH TO GUT HEALTH
Quick read · 2 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Public contextWho is behind it?
Registered owner records: JB7, LLC · ENERGIQUE, INC.
The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
Evidence and sources
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: JB7, LLC, ENERGIQUE, INC.. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedWho is behind it?
Registered in NIH's supplement label database (DSLD)
A government label filing makes the listed formula easier to inspect and compare over time.
Evidence and sources
Label #335642 “60 Billion Probiotic” (Physician's Choice), entered 2025-09-25, with the full Supplement Facts on file. Company on file: Manufacturer — Physician's Choice.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 2
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- No dated review-history series is on file yet.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
The brand has 3 exact supplement-class records
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
🇺🇸JB7, LLC
DELAWARE, USA · Registration application / registration number not stated
6990 West 38th Avenue, Suite 304, Wheat Ridge, COLORADO 80033, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary supplements.
🇺🇸JB7, LLC
COLORADO, USA; DELAWARE, USA · Registration 5545233
12365 Huron St. #1800, Westminster, COLORADO 80234, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary supplements; Nutritional supplements; Vitamin supplements.
🇺🇸ENERGIQUE, INC.
Iowa, USA · Registration application / registration number not stated
201 Apple Boulevard, Woodbine, Iowa 51579, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary supplements; Nutritional supplements; Vitamin supplements.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Background reading
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 150 mg of prebiotic fiber (inulin-type) per serving. Studies we found used 3 g–10 g a day, so this sits below that range.
0studied 3 g–10 g
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Buying options
Where you can check or buy it
Open related seller leads before buying, then confirm the flavor, count, and serving size. Their prices are visible, but LookCloser does not claim savings until the pages share a UPC/GTIN.
Amazon
Submitted listing$59.97
Lowest New observed via Keepa on 2026-08-13.
View on Amazon ↗Brand website
Official product-page candidate · UPC absent$47.05
Useful official shopping lead; excluded from exact price comparisons.
60 Billion Advanced Probiotic · Default Title. The page matches the same named product, but omits the identifier needed to bind the exact sellable unit.
Check brand website ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Walmart ↗Related brand page publishes 4.5/5 across 729 reviews
The related page's review pool may differ from the observed listing. Because the page does not publish a matching UPC/GTIN, LookCloser does not attribute that review aggregate to this exact sellable unit.
Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built August 13, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.