Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists LYNDSAY ERIN BAKER (INDIVIDUAL) in USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full record · lc-14acccdd · back to the summary
300 Billion CFU Probiotics 24 Strains + 15 Herbs Prebiotics
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-07-31
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
25listed rows
22separately quantified
3combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes 22 separately ingredients with amounts and 3 combined blend totals. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digestive Probiotic Blend | 100 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium longum | 6 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium longum HRVD90b | 3 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium breve | 8 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium breve HRVD521 | 5 Billion CFU | — | |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP1 | 10 Billion CFU | — | |
| Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR6 | 4 Billion CFU | — | |
| Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HRVD113 | 4 Billion CFU | — | |
| Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus | 2 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium infantis M63 | 20 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium lactis BS5 | 6.5 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium lactis HRVD524 | 15 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium lactis SD150 | 4 Billion CFU | — | |
| Lactobacillus crispatus LCRO1 | 2.5 Billion CFU | — | |
| Lacticaseibacillus casei HRVD300 | 5 Billion CFU | — | |
| Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF8 | 3 Billion CFU | — | |
| Limosilactobacillus reuteri RD830 | 1 Billion CFU | — | |
| Lactobacillus acidophilus | 2 Billion CFU | — | |
| Dermatological Probiotic Blend | 100 Billion CFU | — | |
| Ligilactobacillus salivarius LS1 | 20 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium lactis | 50 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium longum CECT7347 | 12 Billion CFU | — | |
| Lacticaseibacillus casei CECT9104 | 10 Billion CFU | — | |
| Bifidobacterium bifidum | 8 Billion CFU | — | |
| Cardiovascular Probiotic Blend | 100 Billion CFU | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out1
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing4
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 28 on 2025-12-28 to 27 on 2026-01-17 (net -1). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
3
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
4
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Origin claim “…Not All Probiotics Created Equal: Dmeisy probiotics supplement is made in the USA and it can assure maximum safety and the finest quality.…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-14acccdd (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | Dmeisy |
| Source listing identifier | B0BPMG7JWP |
| Retailer listing title | 300 Billion CFU Probiotics 24 Strains + 15 Herbs Prebiotics, 4 Month S… show full title300 Billion CFU Probiotics 24 Strains + 15 Herbs Prebiotics, 4 Month Supply |
| USPTO brand owner | LYNDSAY ERIN BAKER · INDIVIDUAL · USA |
| Owner filed address | 12220 ROCHFORD LN, JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32225, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 Capsule |
| Servings per container | 60 |
| Pack statement | 60 VEGETARIAN CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | Vegan, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Digestive Probiotic Blend | 100 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium longum | 6 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium longum HRVD90b | 3 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium breve | 8 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium breve HRVD521 | 5 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP1 | 10 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR6 | 4 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HRVD113 | 4 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus | 2 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium infantis M63 | 20 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium lactis BS5 | 6.5 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium lactis HRVD524 | 15 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium lactis SD150 | 4 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Lactobacillus crispatus LCRO1 | 2.5 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Lacticaseibacillus casei HRVD300 | 5 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF8 | 3 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Limosilactobacillus reuteri RD830 | 1 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Lactobacillus acidophilus | 2 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Dermatological Probiotic Blend | 100 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Ligilactobacillus salivarius LS1 | 20 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium lactis | 50 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium longum CECT7347 | 12 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Lacticaseibacillus casei CECT9104 | 10 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bifidobacterium bifidum | 8 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Cardiovascular Probiotic Blend | 100 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“TRIPLE STRENGTH” · “Maximum Potency” · “24 Broad-Spectrum Strains” · “300 Billion CFU with Prebiotics” · “Dietary Supplement” · “Triple Strength Organic Probiotic Supplement” · “All Natural Ingredients for Whole-Body Health” · “Benefits of daily use”
Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Probiotic — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (25,361) · strain-specific; label CFU at-manufacture vs at-expiry differ
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record lc-14acccdd · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai